|
Bibliography by Authors - J [home]
A|
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
G |
H |
I |
J |
K |
L |
M |
N |
O |
P |
Q |
R |
S |
T |
U |
V |
W |
X |
Y |
Z
JAMES, J., 2005. Losing the Competitive Advantage? The Challenge For Science and Technology in the United States. American Electronics Association. (Available at www.aeanet.org/publications/IDJJ_AeA_Competitiveness.asp).
From the report's summary. This report explores the challenges the United States currently faces and, in many ways, is ignoring at its peril. Our purpose is to alert audiences that America's edge, particularly in science and technology, is increasingly at risk. AeA began this discussion in March 2004 with our report on offshore outsourcing. Our view then, as it remains now, was that offshoring is merely a symptom of a dramatically shifting global economy and the U.S. role within it. This report serves as a natural sequel, in that it addresses this big picture. Many of the findings may sound vaguely familiar, even obvious; others may seem surprising. We analyze a number of competitiveness factors within these pages that, when taken in isolation as they so often are, would not necessarily constitute a crisis. But the inter-relationship - the cumulative effect of these trends - makes the more compelling argument that the status quo is unsustainable and that any reasonable person will see the need to act.
JAYANTH, V. 2005. Engineering Quality. The Hindu (March 16).
This article describes some of the problems associated with the rapid growth of engineering colleges in India, mainly private, for-profit colleges. There are now 1,346 engineering colleges with the highest concentration in the south of India. In some cases, students must sit for four different exams for admission, although there has been a move in some states towards a single, standard entrance exam. State governments are fighting with private institutions over regulations and uniform standards. Some private colleges are resenting the standards that a leading university (Anna) is trying to impose on higher engineering education and to the inspection and accreditation process it is trying to implement.
JENNEX, M. E. AND ADELAKUN, O. 2003. Success Factors for Offshore Information System Development. Journal of Information Technology Cases and Applications 5, 3, 12-31.
The paper reports on a survey of personnel from outsource and client companies concerning the factors that are critical for a small-to-medium-sized company in the outsourcing business. Usable responses were received from 201 individuals: 68 from US outsourcers, 59 from non-US outsourcers, and 74 from client organizations. 31 potentially critical success factors, drawn from a literature review, were considered. Six key critical factors were identified. Two of these factors, technical skills and general knowledge skills of the outsource workers, can be directly controlled by the startup outsourcer. Two others, a knowledgeable client contact and trust, are mutually controlled by the vendor and client. The last two critical factors, intellectual property right protection and telecommunications infrastructure, tend to be controlled by the governments of the vendor (and to a lesser degree the client). The article points out that "traditional offshore development is primarily application development. These applications tend to be highly structured requiring little or no changes to the requirements specifications. These projects require less interaction and project management from the client. They are ideal for outsourcing as deliverables and bids are understandable and predictable and risks are better understood. Current offshore development includes e-business and Web application development, and "follow-the-sun" or "round-the-clock" application development. These projects tend to be less structured in nature and need more client contact and project management than traditional offshore development projects. They are less ideal for outsourcing as deliverables, costs, and risks are less predictable." There is a useful literature review in this paper.
JENSEN, J. B. AND KLETZER, L.G. 2005. Tradable Services: Understanding the Scope and Impact of Services Offshoring. In L. Brainard and S. M. Collins Eds. To appear. Brookings Trade Forum 2005 Offshoring White-Collar Work - the Issues and the Implications.
Abstract from the paper. We develop a new empirical approach to identify tradable service activities. Contrary to conventional views of service activities as non-tradable, we find a significant number of service industries and occupations that appear tradable and substantial employment in these tradable activities. Workers employed in tradable service activities differ from workers employed in tradable manufacturing and non-tradable services. In general, we find little evidence that service activities that are tradable have lower employment growth than other service activities. However, at the lowest end of the skill distribution, there is suggestive evidence of lower employment growth. There is also evidence of higher worker displacement in tradable services. Workers displaced form tradable service activities are different from displaced manufacturing workers; displaced tradable service workers have higher skills and higher pre-displacement earnings than displaced manufacturing workers.
JHA, P. 2005. Withering Commitment and Weakening Progress: State and Education in the Era of Neoliberal Reforms. Economic and Political Weekly (Aug. 13) 3677-3684.
The article provides a harsh criticism of the Indian central government for its weakening of support for public education during the neo-liberal reform program since the early 1990s. The article includes a number of tables providing data about public support for education in India.
THE JOINT TASK FORCE FOR COMPUTING CURRICULA 2001. Computing Curricula 2001: Computer Science. ACM Journal of Educational Resources in Computing 1, 3 (Fall).
From the report. This document represents the final report of the Computing Curricula 2001 project (CC2001) - a joint undertaking of the Computer Society of the Institute for Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE-CS) and the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) to develop curricular guidelines for undergraduate programs in computing. The report continues a long tradition of recommendations for academic programs in computing-related fields dating back to 1965…
THE JOINT TASK FORCE FOR COMPUTING CURRICULA 2004. Computer Curricula: Overview Report (Including A Guide to Undergraduate Degree Programs in Computing). The Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), The Association for Information Systems (AIS) and The Computer Society (IEEE-CS) (Nov.).
These three professional societies provide an overview of computer curricula at the undergraduate level.
THE JOINT TASK FORCE FOR COMPUTING CURRICULA 2005. Computing Curricula 2005: The Overview Report. IEEE-CS and ACM (April).
This report outlines recommendations for undergraduate computer science programs. It was prepared by the Computer Society of the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE-CS) and the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). The main points of the report cover the computer science body of knowledge, the computer science undergraduate core, learning objectives, curriculum models, and course descriptions.
JOSEPH, M. 001. China Threatens India Eminence. Wired (Feb. 23). (Available at www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,41656,00.html. Accessed Sept.).
From the Wired Website: India has long ruled Asia in terms of churning out high-level software professionals. But the Chinese government is going full speed ahead on plans to upgrade its computer, and English-language, literacy. Manu Joseph reports from India.
JUSTER, K. I. 2004. Cybersecurity: A Key to U.S.-India Trade. Press Release United States Embassy, New Delhi, India (Oct. 15).
Juster is US Under-Secretary of Commerce. This release is an excerpt of his keynote address at the India-US Information Security Summit. Security is increasingly important in order to fully realize the trade opportunities between the United States and India. In November 2001, President Bush and then-Prime Minister Vajpayee agreed to establish the US-India Cyberterrorism Initiative. In April 2002, they held a meeting in New Delhi of the US-India Cybersecurity Forum with the aim of developing appropriate security standards and strengthening national laws and enforcement mechanisms based in part on the Council of Europe's Convention on Cybercrime. They also hope to develop joint 24/7 watch capabilities.
| |