ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A morphological analysis of the design space of input devices
Full text pdf formatPdf (1.58 MB)
Source ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) archive
Volume 9 ,  Issue 2  (April 1991) table of contents
Special issue on computer—human interaction
Pages: 99 - 122  
Year of Publication: 1991
ISSN:1046-8188
Authors
Stuart K. Card  Xerox Palo Alto Research Center
Jock D. Mackinlay  Xerox Palo Alto Research Center
George G. Robertson  Xerox Palo Alto Research Center
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 31,   Downloads (12 Months): 316,   Citation Count: 37
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/123078.128726
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
ALBERT, A. The effect of graphic input devices on performance in a cursor positioning task. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society-26th Annual Meeting (Seattle, Wash., Oct. 25-28, 1982). Human Factors Society, Santa Monica, Calif., 1982, pp. 54-58.
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
6
7
 
8
CARD, S. K. Human factors and artificial intelligence, In Intelligent Interfaces: Theory, Research and Design, P. A. Hancock and M. H. Chignell, Eds. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1989, pp. 270-284.
 
9
CARD, S. K., ENGLISH, W. K., AND BURR, B. J. Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys for text selection on a CRT. Ergonomics 21, 8 (Aug. 1978), 601-613.
 
10
CARROLL, J. M. Evaluation, description and invention: Paradigms for human-computer interaction. In Advances in Computers, vol. 29, M. C. Yovits, Ed. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif., 1989, 47-77.
11
 
12
ENGLISH, W. K., ENGELBART, D. C., AND BERMAN, M. L. Display-selection techniques for text manipulation. IEEE Trans. Hum. Factors Electron. HFE-8, I (March 1967), 5-15.
 
13
EPPS, B., SNYDER, H., AND MUTOL, W. Comparison of six cursor devices on a target acquisition task. In Proceedings of the Society for Information Display (San Diego, Calif., May 6-8, 1986). Society for Information Display, 1986, pp. 302-305.
 
14
FITTS, P.M. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling amplitude of movement. J. Exper. Psychol. 47, 6 (June 1954), 381-391.
 
15
16
 
17
KARAT, J., McDONALD, J., AND ANDERSON, M. A comparison of selection techniques: Touch panel, mouse and keyboard. In Human-Computer Interaction--INTERACT 84, B. Shackel, Ed. Elsevier North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985, pp. 189-193.
 
18
LANOOLF, G.D. Human motor performance in precise microscopic work. Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Indsutrial Engineering, Univ. of Mmhigan, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1973. (Also published by the MTM Association, Fairlawn, N J., 1973.)
 
19
 
20
MACKENzm, I.S. Fitts' law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Hum-Comput. Interaction. In press.
 
21
22
 
23
MACKINLAY, J. D., CARD, S. K., AND ROBERTSON, G. G. A semantic analysis of the design space of input devices. Hum.-Comput. Interaction 5, 2 3 (1990), 145-190.
24
25
 
26
PENFmLD, W., AND RASMUSSEN, T. The Cerebral Cortex of Man: A Clinical Study of Localization of Function. Macmfilan, New York, 1990.
 
27
 
28
29
30
 
31
SHEmDAN, T. B. Supervisory control of remote manipulators, vehicles and dynamic processes: Experiments in command and display aiding. Adv. Man-Machine Syst. Res. I (1984), 49-137.
 
32
SmWIOREK, D., BELL, G., AND NEWELL, A. Computer Structures. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1981.
 
33
TANNER, P. P., AND BUXTON, W. A.S. Some issues in future UIMS development. In User Interface Management Systems, G. E. Pfaff, Ed. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1985, pp. 67-79.
34
 
35
WELFORD, A.T. Fundamentals of Skill. Methuen, London, 1968.
 
36
WmTEFmLD, D., BALL, R., AND BraD, J. Some comparisons of on-display and off-display touch input devices for interaction with computer generated displays. Ergonomics 26, 11 (1983), 1033-1053.
 
37
ZWmKY, F. The morphological approach to discovery, invention, research, and construction. In New Methods of Thought and Procedure, F. Zwicky and A. G. Wilson, Eds. Springer- Verlag, New York, 1967, 273-297.

CITED BY  37
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Stuart K. Card: colleagues
Jock D. Mackinlay: colleagues
George G. Robertson: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: