How is the designer different from the user?—Focusing on a software development methodology

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

How is the designer different from the user?—Focusing on a software development methodology

Full text

Pdf (1.99 MB)

Source

Papers presented at the seventh workshop on Empirical studies of programmers table of contents

Alexandria, Virginia, United States

Pages: 69 - 90

Year of Publication: 1997

ISBN:0-89791-992-0

Authors

Jinwoo Kim	Department of Business Administration, Yonsei University, 134 Shinchondong, Seodaemungu, Seoul 120-749, Korea
Jungpil Hahn	Department of Business Administration, Yonsei University, 134 Shinchondong, Seodaemungu, Seoul 120-749, Korea
F. Javier Lerch	Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Sponsor

ACM: Association for Computing Machinery

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 1, Downloads (12 Months): 56, Citation Count: 0

Additional Information:

references index terms collaborative colleagues peer to peer

Tools and Actions:	Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTex EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/266399.266406 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Beth Adelson , Elliot Soloway, The role of domain experience in software design, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.11 n.11, p.1351-1360, Nov. 1985 [doi>10.1109/TSE.1985.231883]
	2	Baker, L. and Dunbar, K. (1996), "Problem Spaces in Real-World Science: What are They and How Do Scientists Search Them?", Proceedings of the 18~ Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 21-22
	3	Grady Booch, Object-oriented analysis and design with applications (2nd ed.), Benjamin-Cummings Publishing Co., Inc., Redwood City, CA, 1993
	4	Bums, B. D. and Vollmeyer, R. (1996), "Goals and Problem Solving: Learning as Search of Three Spaces", Proceedings of the 18~ Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 23-24
	5	Bums, B. D. (1996), "Building a Theory of Problem Solving and Scientific Discovery: How big is N in N-space Search?", Proceedings of the 18a Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 19-20
	6	DaM, O. E., Dijkstra, and I-Ioare, C. (1972), Structured Programming, London: Academic Press
	7	Dasgupta, S. (1994), "Creativity, Invention and the Computational Metaphor: Prolegomenon to a Case Study", In T. Dartnall (Ed.), Artificial Intelligence and Creativity: An Interdisciplinary Approach, 259-267, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers
	8	Françoise Détienne, An empirically-derived control structure for the process of program understanding, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, v.33 n.3, p.323-342, Sept. 1990 [doi>10.1016/S0020-7373(05)80122-1]
	9	diSessa, A. A. (1986), "Models of Computation", In D. A. Norman and S. W. Draper (Eds,), User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
	10	Dunbar, K. (1993), "How Scientists Really Reason: Scientific Reasoning in Real-World Laboratories", in R. J. Sterberg and J. Davidson (Eds.). Mechanisms of Insight, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
	11	Ericsson, A. and Simon, H. A. (1993), Protocol Analysis (2~ ed..). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
	12	Carolanne Fisher, Advancing the study of programming with computer-aided protocol analysis, Empirical studies of programmers: second workshop, Ablex Publishing Corp., Norwood, NJ, 1987
	13	Gero, J. S. (1994), "Introduction: Creativity and Design", In T. DartnaU (Ed.), Artificial intelligence and Creativity: An Interdisciplinary Approach, 259-267, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers
	14	Guindon, R. (1990), "Designing the Design Process: Exploiting Opportunistic Thoughts", Human-Computer Interaction, 5, 305-344
	15	Guindon, R., Curtis, B. and Krasner, H. (1987), A Model of Cognitive Processes in Software Design: An Analysis of Breakdowns in Early Design Activities by individuals (MCC Tech. Rep. No. STP-283-87). Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation, Austin, Texas
	16	Hayes, J. R. and Simon, It. A. (1977), "The Understanding Process: Problem Isomorphs", in It. A. Simon (Ed.), Models of Thought, Vol. 1, New Haven: Yale University Press
	17	Hoe, J. M. and Nguyen-Xuan, A. (1990), "Language Semantics, Mental Models and Analogy", In J.M. Hoe, T.R.G. Green, Samurcay and D. J. Gilmore (Eds.), Psyc~logy of Programming,, 139-156, London: Academic Press
	18	John H. Holland , Keith J. Holyoak , Richard E. Nisbett , Paul R. Thagard, Induction: processes of inference, learning, and discovery, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1986
	19	Jackson, M. (1983), System Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
	20	Ivar Jacobson , Maria Ericsson , Agneta Jacobson, The object advantage: business process reengineering with object technology, ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York, NY, 1994
	21	Jeffries, R., Turner, A., Poison, P. G. and Atwood, M. E. (1981), "The Processes Involved in Designing Software", In J. R. Anderson (Eds.), Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition, 255- 283, WJUsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
	22	Kant, E. and Newell, A. (1984), "Problem Solving Techniques for the Design of Algorithms", Information Processing and Management, 20, 97-118
	23	Jinwoo Kim , F. Javier Lerch, Towards a model of cognitive process in logical design: comparing object-oriented and traditional functional decomposition software methodologies, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.489-498, May 03-07, 1992, Monterey, California, United States [doi>10.1145/142750.142905]
	24	Jinwoo Kim , F. Javier Lerch , Herbert A. Simon, Internal representation and rule development in object-oriented design, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), v.2 n.4, p.357-390, Dec. 1995 [doi>10.1145/212430.212450]
	25	Kim, J. and Lerch, F. J. (1997), "Why is Programming (Sometimes) So Difficult?: Programming as Scientific Discovery in Multiple Problem Spaces", Information Systems Research, 8 (1), 25-50.
	26	Klahr, D. and Dunbar, K. (1988), "Dual Space Search During Scientific Reasoning", Cognitive Science, 12, 1-48
	27	Klahr, D., Fay, A. and Dunbar, K. (1993), "Heuristics for Scientific Experimentation: A Development Study", Cognitive Psychology, 25, 111-146
	28	Kuhn, T. S. (1970), The structure of scientific revolutions, 2nd edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
	29	Pat Langley , Herbert A. Simon , Gary L. Bradshaw , Jan M. Zytkow, Scientific discovery: computational explorations of the creative process, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987
	30	Adrienne Lee , Nancy Pennington, The effects of paradigm on cognitive activities in design, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v.40 n.4, p.577-601, April 1994 [doi>10.1006/ijhc.1994.1028 ]
	31	Stanley Letovsky, Cognitive processes in program comprehension, Papers presented at the first workshop on empirical studies of programmers on Empirical studies of programmers, p.58-79, June 1986, Washington, D.C., United States
	32	Mark, W. (1986), "Knowledge-Based Interface Design", In D. A. Norman and S. W. Draper (Eds.), User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
	33	Richard E. Mayer, The Psychology of How Novices Learn Computer Programming, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.13 n.1, p.121-141, March 1981 [doi>10.1145/356835.356841]
	34	Allen Newell, Human Problem Solving, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1972
	35	Norman, D. A. (1986), "Cognitive Engineering", In D. A. Norman and S. W. Draper (Eds.), User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human.Computer Interaction, Hillsdale, NJ: Edbaum
	36	Donald A. Norman, Things that make us smart: defending human attributes in the age of the machine, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1993
	37	Qin, Y. and Simon, H. A. (1990), "Laboratory Replication of Scientific Discovery Processes", Cognitive Science, 14, 281-312
	38	Rist, R. (1989), "Schema Creation in Programming", Cognitive Science, 13, 389-414
	39	James Rumbaugh , Michael Blaha , William Premerlani , Frederick Eddy , William Lorensen, Object-oriented modeling and design, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1991
	40	Schunn, C. D. and Klahr, D. (1995), "A 4-Space Model of Scientific Discovery", Proceedings of the 17~ Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 106-111
	41	Schunn, C. D. and Klahr, D. (1996), "The Problem of Problem Spaces: When and How to Go Beyond a 2-Space Model of Scientific Discovery", Proceedings of the 18~ Annual Conference oft he Cognitive Science Society, 25-26
	42	Simon, H. A. and Lea, G. (1974), "Problem Solving and Rule Induction: A unified View", L.W. Gregg (Ed.), Knowledge and Cognition, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
	43	Simon, H. A. (1973), "The Structure of Ill Structures Problems, Artificial Intelligence, 4, 181- 201
	44	Simon, H. A. (1981), "The Psychology of Thinking: Embedding Artifice in Nature", The Science of the Artificial, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press
	45	Soloway, E., and Erlich, K. (1984). Empirical studies of programming knowledge. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-10, 595-609.
	46	Van Someren, M. W., Bamard, Y. F. and Sandberg, J. A. C. (1994), The Think Aloud Metho& A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes, London: Academic Press
	47	Willemien Visser, More or less following a plan during design: opportunistic deviations in specification, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, v.33 n.3, p.247-278, Sept. 1990 [doi>10.1016/S0020-7373(05)80119-1]
	48	Wolf, D. F. and Beskin, J. R. (1996), "Task Domains in N-Space Models: Giving Explanation Its Due", Proceedings of the 18~ Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 27-28
	49	Edward Yourdon, Modern structured analysis, Yourdon Press, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1989