ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Internet routing instability
Full text PdfPdf (1.95 MB)
Source ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review archive
Volume 27 ,  Issue 4  (October 1997) table of contents
Pages: 115 - 126  
Year of Publication: 1997
ISSN:0146-4833
Also published in ...
Authors
Craig Labovitz  University of Michigan, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 1301 Beal Ave., Ann Arbor, Michigan
G. Robert Malan  University of Michigan, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 1301 Beal Ave., Ann Arbor, Michigan
Farnam Jahanian  University of Michigan, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 1301 Beal Ave., Ann Arbor, Michigan
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 43,   Citation Count: 54
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/263109.263151
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper examines the network inter-domain routing information exchanged between backbone service providers at the major U.S. public Internet exchange points. Internet routing instability, or the rapid fluctuation of network reachability information, is an important problem currently facing the Internet engineering community. High levels of network instability can lead to packet loss, increased network latency and time to convergence. At the extreme, high levels of routing instability have lead to the loss of internal connectivity in wide-area, national networks. In this paper, we describe several unexpected trends in routing instability, and examine a number of anomalies and pathologies observed in the exchange of inter-domain routing information. The analysis in this paper is based on data collected from BGP routing messages generated by border routers at five of the Internet core's public exchange points during a nine month period. We show that the volume of these routing updates is several orders of magnitude more than expected and that the majority of this routing information is redundant, or pathological. Furthermore, our analysis reveals several unexpected trends and ill-behaved systematic properties in Internet routing. We finally posit a number of explanations for these anomalies and evaluate their potential impact on the Internet infrastructure.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
P, Bloomfield, "Fourier Analysis of Time Series: An Introduction," John Wiley ~z Sons, New York. 1976.
 
2
tt.-W. Braun, P. S. Ford and Y. Rekhter, "CIDR and the Evolution of the Internet,' SDSC Report GA- A21364, in Proceedings o/INET'93, Republished in ConneXions Sep 1993 (InterOp93 version).
3
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
J. Honig, D. Katz, M. Mathis, Y. Rekhter, and J. Yu, `~Application of the Border Gateway Protocol in the Internet,' RFC-1164, June 1990.
 
8
Internet Performance Measurement and Analysis project (IPMA), http://www.merit.edu/ipma.
 
9
C. Labovitz, ~Multithreaded Routing Toolkit," Merit Technical Report, 1996.
 
10
C. Labovitz, NANOG presentation, Washington, D.C., May 1996.
 
11
Dave O'Leary, Cisco Systems, Inc. Private communication, January 1997.
 
12
K. Lougheed and Y. Rekhter, "A Border Gateway Protocol (BGP),', RFC-1163 June 1990.
 
13
B. Metcalf, "Predicting the internet's CatastropMc Collapse and Ghost Sites Galore in 1996,' Info World, December 4, 1995.
 
14
Merit :Joint Technical Staff mail archives, http://www.merit.edu/mjts/msg00078.html.
 
15
MFS Communications Mae-East Statistics Page, http://ww~.mf~t.com/MA~/~s~.st~ts.ht~.
 
16
North American Network Operators Group, http://www.nanog.org.
17
 
18
Y. Rekhter, "Scalable Support for Multi-homed Multi- Provider Connectivity," NAN OG, Ann Arbor, MI. October 1996.
 
19
Y. Rekhter and C. Topolcic, ``Exchanging Routing Information Across Provider Boundaries in the CIDR Environment,' RFG-1520. September 1993.
 
20
Routing Arbiter web pages, http://www.ra.ne~;.
 
21
K. Varadhan, R. Govindan, and D. Estrin, "Persistent Routing Oscillations in Inter-Domain Routing," USC/ISI, Available at the Routing Arbiter project's homepage at USC/ISI.
 
22
C. Villamizer, R. Chandra, and R. Govindan, "draftietf-idr-route-dampen-00-previevf', Internet Engineering Task Force Draft, July 21, 1995.
 
23
C. Villaxnizer, ``TCP Response Under Loss Conditions", NANOG Presentation, San Francisco, February 1997.

CITED BY  54
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Craig Labovitz: colleagues
G. Robert Malan: colleagues
Farnam Jahanian: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: