ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Designing presentations for on-demand viewing
Full text PdfPdf (488 KB)
Source Computer Supported Cooperative Work archive
Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work table of contents
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Pages: 127 - 134  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISBN:1-58113-222-0
Authors
Liwei He  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA
Jonathan Grudin  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA
Anoop Gupta  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA
Sponsors
SIGGROUP: ACM Special Interest Group on Supporting Group Work
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 57,   Citation Count: 14
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/358916.358983
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Increasingly often, presentations are given before a live audience, while simultaneously being viewed remotely and recorded for subsequent viewing on-demand over the Web. How should video presentations be designed for web access? How is video accessed and used online? Does optimal design for live and on-demand audiences conflict? We examined detailed behavior patterns of more than 9000 on-demand users of a large corpus of professionally prepared presentations. We find that as many people access these talks on-demand as attend live. Online access patterns differ markedly from live attendance. People watch less overall and skip to different parts of a talk. Speakers designing presentations for viewing on-demand should emphasize key points early in the talk and early within each slide, use slide titles that reveal the talk structure and are meaningful outside the flow of the talk. In some cases the recommendations conflict with optimal design for live audiences. The results also provide guidance in developing tools for on-demand multimedia authoring and use.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
Belanger, P.C. & Clement, S., 1995. Using video-ondemand for educational purposes: Observations from a three-month experiment. Canadian Journal of Educational Communication, 24, 1, 61-83.
 
6
Branch, P. & Durran, J., 1996. PC based video on demand trials. In Learning Technologies: Prospects and pathways. Selected papers from EdTech '96 Biennial Conference of the Australian Society for Educational Technology.
 
7
Harrigan, K.A., 1996. Just noticeable difference and effects of searching of user-controlled time-compressed digital-video. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Toronto.
8
9
10
11
 
12
 
13
Morkes, J. & Nielson, J., 1997. Concise, SCANNABLE, and objective: How to write for the Web. http://www.useit.com/papers/webwriting/writing.html
14
 
15
Nielsen, J., 1997. Guidelines for multimedia on the Web. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9512.html
16
17

CITED BY  14
 
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Liwei He: colleagues
Jonathan Grudin: colleagues
Anoop Gupta: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: