ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Creating an empirical basis for adaptation decisions
Full text pdf formatPdf (1.42 MB)
Source International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces archive
Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces table of contents
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Pages: 149 - 156  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISBN:1-58113-134-8
Authors
Anthony Jameson  Department of Computer Science/Department of Psychology, University of Saarbrücken, P.O. Box 15 11 50, 66041 Saarbrücken, Germany
Barbara Großmann-Hutter  Department of Computer Science/Department of Psychology, University of Saarbrücken, P.O. Box 15 11 50, 66041 Saarbrücken, Germany
Leonie March  Department of Computer Science/Department of Psychology, University of Saarbrücken, P.O. Box 15 11 50, 66041 Saarbrücken, Germany
Ralf Rummer  Department of Computer Science/Department of Psychology, University of Saarbrücken, P.O. Box 15 11 50, 66041 Saarbrücken, Germany
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 18,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/325737.325812
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

How can an adaptive intelligent interface decide what particular action to perform in a given situation, as a function of perceived properties of the user and the situation? Ideally, such decisions should be made on the basis of an empirically derived causal model. In this paper we show how such a model can be constructed given an appropriately limited system and domain: On the basis of data from a controlled experiment, an influence diagram for making adaptation decisions is learned automatically. We then discuss why this method will often be infeasible in practice, and how parts of the method can nonetheless be used to create a more solid basis for adaptation decisions.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
R. T. Clemen. Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis. Duxbury, Pacific Grove, CA, 1996.
 
3
B. Groomann-Hutter, A. Jameson, and F. Wittig. Learning Bayesian networks with hidden variables for user modeling. In Proceedings of the ZJCAZ99 Workshop "Learning About Users", Stockholm, July 31st 1999, 1999.
 
4
5
 
6
A. Jameson. User-adaptive systems: An integrative overview. Tutorial presented at UM99, the Seventh International Conference on User Modeling, Banff, Canada, 1999. Available from http:l/www.cs.unisb.de/users/jamesonl.
7
 
8
F. Jensen, F. V. Jensen, and S. L. Dittmer. Frominfluence diagrams to junction trees. In R. Lopez de Mantaras and D. Poole, editors, Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Uncertainty in Arti$ciaC Intelligence, pages 367-373. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 1994.
 
9
 
10
L. March. Ressourcenadaptive Instruktionen in einem Hotline-Szenario {Resource-adaptive instructions in a hotline scenario}. Master's thesis, Department of Psychology, University of Saarbrticken, Germany, 1999.
 
11
M. K. Sein and R. I'. Bostrom. Individual differences and conceptual models in training novice users. Human- Computer Interaction, 4: 197-229, 1989.
 
12
 
13


Collaborative Colleagues:
Anthony Jameson: colleagues
Barbara Großmann-Hutter: colleagues
Leonie March: colleagues
Ralf Rummer: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: