ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Markup systems and the future of scholarly text processing
Full text pdf formatPdf (1.91 MB)
Source Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 30 ,  Issue 11  (November 1987) table of contents
Pages: 933 - 947  
Year of Publication: 1987
ISSN:0001-0782
Authors
James H. Coombs  Brown Univ., Providence, RI
Allen H. Renear  Brown Univ., Providence, RI
Steven J. DeRose  Brown Univ., Providence, RI
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 130,   Citation Count: 30
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/32206.32209
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Markup practices can affect the move toward systems that support scholars in the process of thinking and writing. Whereas procedural and presentational markup systems retard that movement, descriptive markup systems accelerate the pace by simplifying mechanical tasks and allowing the authors to focus their attention on the content.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Alexander. G.B. Computer aids for authors and editors: A natural extension of word processing and typesetting? Seybold Rep. Publ. Syst. 13, 10 {Feb. 13. 1984), 3-21.
 
2
American National Standards Institute. Infornuzfio~~ Processi,lg-Text and Office Systems-Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML). IS0 8879-1986 (E), ANSI, New York. 1986. (First edition: Oct. 15. 1986.)
 
3
Association for Computing Machinery. Proceedings ?f thy ACM SIGPLAN-SIGOA Symposium on Text Manipulatim. ACM. New York, 1981.
 
4
Association of American Publishers. Electronic Maruscript Project: Task I Report. Aspen Systems, Rockville. Md.. 1984.
 
5
Association of American Publishers. Standard for EIwtrmtic Manuscript Preparafion and Markup. Electronic Manuscript Series. Association of American Publishers. Washington, D.C.. Feb. 1986.
 
6
Association of American Publishers. Author's Guide fo Electronic Manuscript Preparation and Markup. Electronic Manuscript Series. Association of American Publishers. Washington. D.C.. May 1986.
 
7
BDS. (TAG) The SGML Newsletter. BDS. Sterling, Va.
8
 
9
Bush. V. As we may think. Afl. Mon. 776. 1 (July 1945). 101-108.
 
10
Carmody, S., Cross. W.. Nelson, T.H., Rice, D., and van Dam, A. A hypertext editing system for the /360. In Perfinmt Concepts in Computer Graphics. M. Faiman and J. Nievergelt. Eds. University of Illinois Press, Urbana. Ill., 1969, pp. 291-330.
11
 
12
Coombs. J.H. Information management system for scholars. Tech. Memo. TM 69-2, Computer Center. Brown Univ., Providence. R.I.. Dec. 1986.
 
13
Coombs, J.H., Scott, A.M., Landow. G.P.. and Sanders, A.A., Eds. A Pm-Raphaelite Friendship: The Correspondence of William Holman Hunt and John Lucas Tupper. UMI Research Press, Ann Arbor. Mich., 1986.
 
14
Corda. U.. and Facchetti. G. Concept browser: A system for interactive creation of dynamic documentation. In Texf Processing and Document Manipulation, J.C. van Vliet. Ed. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. Mass., 1986, pp. 233-245.
 
15
Drucker. P.F. Management; Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices. Harper and Row. New York. 1973.
 
16
Engelhart, D.C.. and English, W.K. A research center for augmenting human intellect. In Proceedings of the AFIPS Fall joint Computer Can- /erence (San Francisco, Calif.. Dec. 9-11). AFIPS Press, Reston. Va., 1968. pp. 395-410.
 
17
Engelhart. D.C.. Watson, R.W.. and Norton, J.C. The augmented knowledge workship. In Proceedings of the National Computer Conference (New York, June 4-8). AFIPS Press, Reston, Va., 1973. pp. 9-2 1.
18
 
19
Integration and pagination: Long documents. proposals, books. Seybold Rep. Publ. Syst. 16. 16 (Apr. 27, 1987). 21-27.
 
20
Interfaces. media converters and OCR devices. Seybold Rep. Publ. sysr. 75. 18 (June 2. 1986). 34-39.
 
21
Lamport. L. LATEX User's Guide and Reference Manual. Addison- Wesley. Reading, Mass., 1986.
22
23
 
24
Modern Language Association. MLA Handbook. MLA. New York. 1977.
 
25
Modern Language Association. ML.4 Handbook. MLA. New York. 1984.
 
26
Nelson. T.H. Getting it out of our system. In I~@malio~~ Rcfrieval: A Critic-al Rruiew. G. Schecter, Ed. Thompson, Washington, D.C.. 1967. pp. 191-210.
 
27
Nelson. T.H. Cnrrrpul. Libr. (1974).
 
28
Nelson. T.H. Llferaq Machirm. Nelson. Nashville. Term.. 1981.
 
29
Nievergelt. 1.. Coray. G.. Nicoud. I.D.. and Shaw. A.C.. Eds. Documetlf Prcparafrw Sys~rnrs. North-Holland. Amsterdam. 1982.
30
31
32
 
33

CITED BY  30
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


REVIEW

"Christopher L. Hallgren : Reviewer"

This paper considers the academic text in relation to text processing. In some ways, the view of the authors strikes a pose promised in the myth of truly portable generalized markup languages that loomed on the horizon in the 1960s. They repeat   more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
James H. Coombs: colleagues
Allen H. Renear: colleagues
Steven J. DeRose: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: