Impacts of life cycle models on software configuration management

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Impacts of life cycle models on software configuration management

Full text

Pdf (3.24 MB)

Source

Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 34 , Issue 8 (August 1991) table of contents

Pages: 104 - 118

Year of Publication: 1991

ISSN:0001-0782

Authors

Alan M. Davis	George Mason Univ., Fairfax, VA
Edward H. Bersoff	BTG, Inc., Vienna, VA

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 11, Downloads (12 Months): 141, Citation Count: 8

Additional Information:

references cited by index terms review collaborative colleagues peer to peer

Tools and Actions:	Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTex EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/108515.108537 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Agresti, W. Tutorial: New Paradigms for software development IEEE computer society. washington D.C. 1986.
	2	Alexander, L. and Davis, A. Selection criteria for software developmerit life cycle models: Masters Thesis, George Mason University, Faid~tx, Va. i 990. in Proceedings o/ the IEEE Computer Software and Applications Conference (Washington, D.C.), lr~r~r, t~omput. Soc., i99i.
	3	Wayne A. Babich, Software configuration management: coordination for team productivity, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1986
	4	Edward H. Bersoff , Stanley Siegel , Vilas Henderson, Software Configuration Management: An Investment in Product Integrity, Prentice Hall Professional Technical Reference, 1980
	5	Edward H. Bersoff , Stanley Siegel , Vilas Henderson, Software Configuration Management: An Investment in Product Integrity, Prentice Hall Professional Technical Reference, 1980
	6	Bersoff, E. and Davis, A. Some sakldjf lsadjf sadjflksj saldj adfj saldkfj saldfjlksdjf lsdfj for Cal systems. SIGNAL (1991).
	7	Barry W. Boehm, A Spiral Model of Software Development and Enhancement, Computer, v.21 n.5, p.61-72, May 1988 [doi>10.1109/2.59 ]
	8	G Booch, Object-oriented development, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.12 n.2, p.211-221, Feb. 1986
	9	Peter Coad , Edward Yourdon, Object-oriented analysis, Yourdon Press, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1990
	10	Davis, A. The design of a family of applications-oriented requirements languages, iEEE Comput. 15, 5 (May 1982), 2 t-28.
	11	Davis, A. Customized automated configuration management. STARS UUOlllkai'~ I I ~ttlt~53 ~Ul), i'~9v. 1985.
	12	A. M. Davis , H. Bersoff , E. R. Comer, A Strategy for Comparing Alternative Software Development Life Cycle Models, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.14 n.10, p.1453-1461, October 1988 [doi>10.1109/32.6190 ]
	13	Alan,M. Davis, A comparison of techniques for the specification of external system behavior, Communications of the ACM, v.31 n.9, p.1098-1115, Sept. 1988 [doi>10.1145/48529.48534]
	14	Alan M. Davis, Software requirements: analysis and specification, Prentice Hall Press, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1990
	15	Davis, A. Operational prototyping: The POST story submitted to IEEE Softw., i 99 i.
	16	Digital Equipment Corporation. VAX DEC/CMS Reference Manual. /Vl~yllar(.l, 1~~aSS.~ NOV. 1984.
	17	DeMi!lo, R. Observing reusable Ada software components~techniques opei-auo{!al mcto~u~g a~ mg histories. AIRMICS Project Review, Fairfax, Va., Feb. l, 1989.
	18	Departmem of' Defense, Military Standard: Defeme System Software Irlmmln6ma~ I~CI D-.~TB-91 fi7 A Washington, D.C., Feb. 1988.
	19	Freeman, P. IEEE Tutorial: Software RetLmbitit~. Washington D_C_: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1987.
	20	Fricker, S. Configuration management using the change and configuration control (CCC) 2.0 environment, Second Annual CCC Users Group (Mar. 1985).
	21	Hassan Gomaa , Douglas B.H. Scott, Prototyping as a tool in the specification of user requirements, Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Software engineering, p.333-342, March 09-12, 1981, San Diego, California, United States
	22	Gomaa, H. Software prototypes- Keep them or throw them away?. on Prototyping, Pergamon Press, London, 1986.
	23	David Harel, Statecharts: A visual formalism for complex systems, Science of Computer Programming, v.8 n.3, p.231-274, June 1, 1987 [doi>10.1016/0167-6423(87)90035-9 ]
	24	D. Harel , H. Lachover , A. Naamad , A. Pnueli , M. Politi , R. Sherman , a. Shtul-Trauring, Statemate: a working environment for the development of complex reactive systems, Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Software engineering, p.396-406, April 11-15, 1988, Singapore
	25	Horowitz, E.. eta!, A Survey of Application Generators. IEEE Softw., 2, i (jan. i985), 40-54.
	26	Incorvaia, A. and Davis, A. Case studies in software reuse. IEEE COMPSAC '90, {EEE Computer Society Press, Washington, D.C., 1990.
	27	Martin, j~ Fourth Generation Lang~xtges. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1986.
	28	Orr. K.User focuswed system development need planningand desing IEEE 1987, 5-7.
	29	D. L. Parnas, On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules, Communications of the ACM, v.15 n.12, p.1053-1058, Dec. 1972 [doi>10.1145/361598.361623]
	30	H. Partsch , R. Steinbrüggen, Program Transformation Systems, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.15 n.3, p.199-236, Sept. 1983 [doi>10.1145/356914.356917]
	31	Rochkind, M. 'The source code contro! system. IEEE Tram~ Softw. Eng. t, 12 (Dec. 1975), 364-370.
	32	W. W. Royce, Managing the development of large software systems: concepts and techniques, Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Software Engineering, p.328-338, March 1987, Monterey, California, United States
	33	SofFool Corporation. Change and Configuration Control (CCC) User's Manual. Goleta, Calif., 1988.
	34	Vogelsong, T, Remarks made during interview by A. Davis -' A Incorvaia, Arlington, Virginia: U.S. AIRMICS RAPID Project, July 27, 11'-'liO FI
	35	Anthony I. Wasserman, Extending state transition diagrams for the specification of human-computer interaction, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.11 n.8, p.699-713, Aug. 1985 [doi>10.1109/TSE.1985.232519]
	36	Yourdon, E. and Constantine, L. Structured Design. Prentice Halls Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1979.
	37	Edward Yourdon, Modern structured analysis, Yourdon Press, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1989

CITED BY 8

	A. Nico Habermann, Ada and beyond, Proceedings of the conference on TRI-Ada '91: today's accomplishments; tomorrow's expectations, p.466-474, October 21-25, 1991, San Jose, California, United States
	Erran Carmel, A discussion of special characteristics for software package development life cycle models, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, v.18 n.2, p.23-24, April 1993
	Xavier A. Debest , Rüdiger Knoop , Jürgen Wagner, Reveng: a cost-effective approach to reverse-engineering, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, v.17 n.4, p.60-67, Oct. 1992
	Burt Leavenworth, Proxy: an interpreter for rapid prototyping, ACM SIGPLAN Notices, v.27 n.6, p.19-28, June 1992
	Hilda Tellioğlu , Ina Wagner, Negotiating Boundaries. Configuration Management in Software DevelopmentTeams, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, v.6 n.4, p.251-274, 1997
	Jeff Butterfield , Jay G. Cooprider , Sukumar Rathnam, Resolving cognitive conflict in requirements definition: a blackboard-based model and system architecture, Proceedings of the 1994 computer personnel research conference on Reinventing IS : managing information technology in changing organizations: managing information technology in changing organizations, p.105-115, March 24-26, 1994, Alexandria, Virginia, United States
	Alan M. Davis, Operational Prototyping: A New Development Approach, IEEE Software, v.9 n.5, p.70-78, September 1992
	Petri J. Pulli , Marko P. Heikkinen, Concurrent Engineering for Real-Time Systems, IEEE Software, v.10 n.6, p.39-44, November 1993

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
D. Software
D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
D.2.9 Management
Subjects: Software configuration management

General Terms:
Management

REVIEW

"Leo G. Egan, Jr. : Reviewer"

I read this paper twice. It seems to deviate from the implied thrust of the title. It jumps around and frequently seems to be filling up space with tutorial explanations of software configuration management. If one pierces through this style, more...

Collaborative Colleagues:

Alan M. Davis: colleagues

Edward H. Bersoff: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read:

Web application security assessment by fault injection and behavior monitoring Proceedings of the 12th international conference on World Wide Web
Yao-Wen Huang , Shih-Kun Huang , Tsung-Po Lin , Chung-Hung Tsai
Data structures for quadtree approximation and compression Communications of the ACM 28, 9
Hanan Samet
A hierarchical single-key-lock access control using the Chinese remainder theorem Proceedings of the 1992 ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied computing
Kim S. Lee , Huizhu Lu , D. D. Fisher
The GemStone object database management system Communications of the ACM 34, 10
Paul Butterworth , Allen Otis , Jacob Stein
Putting innovation to work: adoption strategies for multimedia communication systems Communications of the ACM 34, 12
Ellen Francik , Susan Ehrlich Rudman , Donna Cooper , Stephen Levine

Adobe Acrobat

QuickTime

Windows Media Player

Real Player