ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Some considerations for using approximate optimal queries
Full text PdfPdf (536 KB)
Source Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 10th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval table of contents
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Pages: 19 - 23  
Year of Publication: 1987
ISBN:0-89791-232-2
Author
K. L. Kwok  Computer Science Department, Queens College, City University of New York, Flushing, New York, USA
Sponsor
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 11,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/42005.42008
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

An optimal query has been defined as one which will recover all the known relevant documents of a query in their best probability of relevance ranking. We have slightly modified the definition so that it also allows one to trace its evolution from the original to the optimal via the various feedback stages. Such a query can be constructed by modifying the original query with terms from the known relevant documents. It is pointed out that such a term addition strategy differs materially from other approaches that add terms based on term association with all query terms, and calculated from the whole document collection. The effect of viewing a document as constituted of components, and hence affecting the weighting and retreival results of of the optimal query, is also discussed.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
Salton, G.; Yang, C. S.; Yu, C.T. "A theory of term importance in automatic text analysis." j. of ASIS. 26:33-44; 1975.
 
4
Sparck Jones, K. Automatic keyword classification for information retrieval. Connecticut: Archon Books; 1971.
 
5
Robertson, S. E.; Sparck Jones, K. "Relevance weighting of search terms." J. of ASIS. 27:129-146; 1976. ,$
 
6
Sparck Jones, K. Experiments in relevance weighting of search terms." Info. Proc. Mgmnt. 15:133-144; 1979.
 
7
van Rijsbergen, C.J. "A theoretical basis for the use of co-occurrence data in information retrieval." J. of Doc. 33:106-i19; 1977.
 
8
Harper, D.J. ; van Rijsbergen, C.J. "An evaluation of feedback in document retrieval using co-occurrence data." Journal of Documentation. 34:189-216; 1978.
 
9
van Rijsbergen, C. J. ; Harper, D.J. ; Porter, M. F. "The selection of good search terms." Info. Proc. Mgmnt. 17:77-91; 1981.
 
10
Yu, C. T. ; Buckley, C. ; Lam, K. ; Salton, G."A generalized term dependence model in information retrieval." Info.Tech. : R&D. 2:129- 154 ; 1983.
 
11
Smeaton A.F. ;van Rijsbergen, C.J. "The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system." Computer J. 26:239-246; 1983.
 
12
Rocchio, J.J. "Relevance feedback in information retrieval." in The SMART Retrieval Systems, ed. Salton, G. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1971.
13
14
15
 
16
 
17
Croft, W. B. ; Harper, D. J."Using probabilistic models of document retrieval without relevance information."J. of Doc.35:285-295; 1979.
 
18
Sparck Jones,K."A statistical interprestation of term specificity and its application in retrieval." J. of Doc. 8:11-21; 1972.
 
19
Feinman,R. ;Kwok, K.L. "Classification of scientific documents by means of self-generated groups employing free language." J. of ASIS. 24 : 382-396 ; 1973.


Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: