General Judging Criteria

1. Each student will be evaluated by a minimum of three faculty members; none of which are affiliated with the student's university.
2. Judges will be assigned to a group of student research projects.
3. The following weights and measures will be used by a particular judge to evaluate the abstract/research:

Scale for accepting the abstract:
Problem and motivation: 5 points
Background and related work: 5 points
Approach and uniqueness: 10 points
Results and contribution: 10 points

Scale for evaluating the visual presentation of the research:
Oral presentation: 10 points
Visual presentation: 10 points
Research methods: 15 points
Significance of contribution: 10 points
4. The top five students in each category will advance to the semi-finals.

Scale for evaluating the conference presentation of the research:
Knowledge of research area: 15 points
Contribution of research: 10 points
Presentation: 10 points
5. A minimum of five judges will be assigned to the semi-finals. Each judge will rank their evaluations based on the assigned score. This ranking will be used to determine the finalists.
ACM Home | Join ACM | Membership | Chapters | Code of Ethics