|


Invitations
Archives
|
|
|
|
Reader Comments:
Aging: A Professional Nightmare
Re: "As A Man Grows Older," Ubiquity April 4, 2000
I concur with the "mature" worker's thoughts expressed in the article.
I was laid off less than 10 months before my 55th birthday; my employer was
well aware that I intended to take early retirement at age 55. I had prided
myself on keeping up-to-date with my specialty for over 27 years in academia
and private industry. I typically spent $3,000 to $6,000 (or more) out of my
own pocket each year to attend short courses, conferences, buy periodicals
and professional subscriptions, in addition to being actively involved in
professional technical activities including the publishing and presentation
of technical papers. During my industrial career I was recognized for some
of my achievements by being elected one of the relatively few non-academic
ACM Fellows. Yet despite my achievements, the last two years have been a
professional nightmare despite extensive experience in academia and private
industry. I cite a few examples here.
1. I conducted a two-year nationwide academic job search with no success
despite or because I was over age 50 and had been a senior faculty person in
research-oriented universities even before entering private industry. An
extensive review of job ads in the ACM Communications will show that
an overwhelming majority are for entry-level assistant professors. My
experience and age make me "unacceptable" for most advertised academic
positions. I have worked as an adjunct faculty member at a few institutions
but the pay is based on that for an entry level instructor or assistant
professor despite my extensive previous academic and industrial experience.
The attitude at many of the academic institutions I approached is that they
want a low-priced, experienced person who can teach the entire computer
science curriculum; this is in many cases a polite way to say we want a warm
body to come in to "read" from a textbook but we don't want anyone with
experience that would offer insight beyond what is in the textbook. With
respect to pay, one small private college offered me $22,000 per year to
teach 4 to 6 computer science courses per semester as well as serve as
advisor for 400 students and define a new and revised academic curriculum!
One institution suggested that I should essentially work for "free" since I
was over 55 and "that would be a way to give back to society." I informed
that person that I had been giving back to society long before age 55 by
such activities as serving as an unpaid national lecturer for six
professional societies over the past 26 years. I also reminded this
individual that I would not be receiving any retirement benefits for at
least another six years.
2. I also conducted a nationwide search in industry with similar lack of
results. I have tried to survive as a consultant and adjunct faculty member
at several schools (junior colleges, colleges and universities). Many of my
consulting experiences have included lots of expectations of free consulting
time and late payments for work already satisfactorily completed. This has
been a roller coaster experience, dissolving much of my savings that I had
intended for my retirement days.
3. As the writer of the article indicated, I too have experienced
interviewers more interested "in the quality of my work as a free
consultant." This included a university that expected me to work for over 40
hours a week but only would compensate me for 20 hours a week at graduate
student rates.
4. I recently was accepted as a government summer research fellow based
upon my extensive industrial experience. I hope that superior performance in
that position will lead to follow-up work. If my situation does not improve
after the end of this summer, I will feel forced to seek out minimum wage
positions. My initial experience in this area has already led to rejections
from retail establishments as soon as they see M.A. and Ph.D. on the
employment application.
I would like to continue to work in CS or IT and I know I have lots to
contribute to both academia and private industry but based on events during
the past two years, I don't seem to be wanted or needed much anymore for my
capabilities and experience.
-- Anonymous under-employed ACM Fellow
Consider It a Paid Sabbatical
Re: "As A Man Grows Older," Ubiquity April 4, 2000
I read the article with considerable interest and thought: "How sad
that it must be anonymous!" I was -- and remain -- older than the author
when a strikingly similar thing happened to me. Not only was I unemployed,
but there were at least 30,000 others out there within a 50-mile radius in
competition with me! I, too, moved out of state to find a job after 11
months of searching. I, too, sold my home of more than 11 years, uprooted my
family, and moved across the continent to take a much lower-paying job
because that's what was offered, and it paid the mortgage.
I came to see the job as a "Paid Sabbatical," -- and this made it bearable
-- while allowing me to continue my search for a more suitable position, and
one that would provide compensation in a more suitable range. It has taken
more than 15 months, but I have now in hand an offer that allows my family
more leisure, and the comforts of a secure future. Moreover, I have pending
several other offers which promise to make our "Golden Years" live up to the
popular appellation. I am this year 64, and from this experience, I've
learned that our greatest enemy is despair. I survived that with the help
and unstinting support of the most loving and supportive person I've ever
known -- my wife.
-- Lawrence Smythe
Like Trading in the Family Car
Re: "As A Man Grows Older," Ubiquity April 4, 2000
At 50 years of age I have experienced a good chunk of life and at times I
feel compelled to self comment "Here we go again!" . . . because I too can
see and feel the cyclical and developmental patterns surrounding us.
Additionally, this compels me to reflect upon the feelings and frustrations
I faced while witnessing a former employer's fixation to hire younger team
members -- the hirings felt demeaning because they were conducted with the
flair of replacing the family auto. So instead of waiting my turn, I struck
out on my own with as much confidence as a 10-year-old walking through a
graveyard on Halloween. Nonetheless, here I am several years later and
living proof that there's life after "Corporate America" and all because I
have something only experience can supply and that's the knowledge that the
sun will rise again tomorrow no matter what employment I have or do not
have. So to make this short I've selected some of the self talk affirmations
that amused me when I needed it most.
"Etorres Law": The other line moves faster. (A corollary to the "Grass is
Greener Effect")
"The Path of Progress": The longest distance between any two points is a
shortcut. (The corollary of "Anything is Easy with Insufficient
Information")
"Brian's First Law": At some time in the life cycle of virtually every
organization, it's ability to succeed in spite of itself runs out.
(Corollaries of "Humpty Dumpty and The Emperor's New Clothes")
Please pass this along to our writer in distress if you believe it'll bring
a smile.
-- Name Withheld by Request
Age Discrimination Spreading like a Virus
Re: "As A Man Grows Older," Ubiquity April 4, 2000
The person who wrote the article points out something that ACM should take
very seriously. I am 58, and every day I wonder when someone will decide a
younger person probably knows more than me, and will probably work for less.
Very soon a lot of baby-boomers will be in this boat. This business about
age discrimination is real and companies are getting by with it. It is
common conversation where I work, and at other places I go. I recently spent
a night in a medical center facility, and the staff there was talking about
it happening to the older medical doctors.
-- A 50-plus Ubiquity Reader
Spam the Computing Pros?
Re: "As A Man Grows Older," Ubiquity April 4, 2000
A poll of computing professionals asking for age, sex, salary, and other
typical demographic data might be reliably run by ACM using email, provided
a general-enough population could be adequately addressed. But that's
problematic. Who do you poll?
A poll of ACM members would, I believe, target the wrong population.
People in our profession who are sufficiently concerned with keeping
current, or improving the quality of their personal professional service, to
join ACM or maintain their membership, are almost certainly older and wiser,
and produce more efficiently and effectively, than the less-experienced
professional, taken across the population.
You might find a way to get a survey instrument sent to all ISO
9001/TickIT organization software professionals, perhaps through the sector
and accreditation agency (DISC and UKAS) and the registration service
suppliers, all of whom would be quite interested in the results. Same story
here, though: if you care enough to create, maintain, and register a quality
management system, you are not representative of all software engineering
professionals.
While nobody's keeping tabs on all the efforts directed toward using
other management systems, such as the various Capability Maturity Models, or
efforts of computing professionals associated with organizations applying
for the National Quality Award or one of the other Quality prizes, each of
these areas might provide its own mechanism to get such a survey into the
appropriate hands. And for similar reasons, such a population would be
skewed substantially away from general computing professionals.
Two things all computing professionals almost certainly have in common
today are an email address, and a web browser. Perhaps ACM could use spam to
help eliminate these population biases. Perhaps there's another way to reach
a balanced population. How long has it been since ACM went outside its own
membership for this sort of survey?
-- John Wiley
Cultural Filters on Knowledge Transfer
Re: "Common Knowledge: How Companies Thrive by Sharing What They Know,"
Ubiquity April 4, 2000
I found the Knowledge Transfer article a path-breaking effort, however
would like to see a "cultural filter" applied, be that organizational
culture or national culture, that inhibits some transfer processes and
enhances others. . . . A Ph.D. topic?
-- Steve Torok
Does Sharing of Ideas Thwart Creativity?
Re: "Common Knowledge: How Companies Thrive by Sharing What They Know,"
Ubiquity April 4, 2000
It would be interesting to analyze whether the level of original thought
in an organization increased, decreased or stayed the same after
implementing Knowledge Management (KM). Without KM, the number of disparate
non-communicating groups is larger which might suggest a higher degree of
original thought, some clearly redundant, some forming a potentially larger
pool of original thought than after KM. Particularly the E&Y example
suggests that after a period of time all proposals may converge with just a
small portion of any one proposal containing original thought. Such a
convergence is often termed "boilerplate proposals." Clearly in such a
situation, an inordinate effort would have to be maintained when developing
proposals to ensure proper credit and due is given those who developed
various components of any one proposal. The organization certainly owns all
intellectual property, yet employees do need the satisfaction of recognition
for those components that were their own original creative contributions.
Whether KM accelerates through the enthusiasm of contribution, or
decelerates through the common human trait of opportunity (i.e. laziness)
the total measured creative efforts of an organization as a whole would be
an interesting follow-up study. Often, sequestered design competitions are
done within organizations to increase the amount of creative non-conforming
thought. Does KM thwart that in some instances? One could formulate an
equation of original beneficial ideas and the processes where implementation
occurred and derive a Riemann integration where the area represented the
total organization benefit. The degree of KM sharing could then be varied to
optimize the amount of intercommunication that enhances sharing of good
ideas, versus deliberate non-communication to gestate original creativity.
The right degree of KM would produce the maximum (maybe multiple maximal)
areas, a balance of independent creative thinking with just the right amount
of sharing. A well developed simulation model of such behavioral processes
would make a great graduate paper!
-- Leo Lutchansky, Jr.
Watts Up? Watts Down? Big Deal!
Re: "Why 99.9 Percent is Not Good Enough," Ubiquity, April 4, 2000
The power grid is not 100% reliable. So what's news there? I've been
running with backup UPS systems for five years in my small company and now
have three 1KWH UPS systems keeping my systems impervious to the usual
outages (we had a five-minute outage last night and I kept on typing . . .
.) If I were running a serious site with 24/7 requirements, I'd have a
serious UPS system with multi-hour capability. If I were really concerned,
I'd add a backup generator. Note that I don't need fancy power switching
equipment; it is built into the UPS systems. The 20 minutes a UPS system
provides is more than adequate to cut in an emergency generator. We looked
at a system like this 20 years ago (but the batteries were larger, since it
was running a mainframe). Or was this just a disguised attempt to flog
either a technology or a technology report?
-- Joseph M. Newcomer
Mergers and Web Sites
Re: "Dot to Dot-Com," Ubiquity, March 28, 2000
Great article by Professor Hoffman, though some discussion in handling
corporate mergers and what they do to web sites would have been interesting.
Professor Hoffman provided a great example with www.itn.net which has been
consumed by American Express Travel.
-- Leo Lutchansky, Jr.
|
[Home]
[About Ubiquity]
[The Editors]
Ubiquity welcomes the submissions of articles from everyone interested in the future of information
technology. Everything published in Ubiquity is copyrighted ©2000 by the ACM and the individual authors.
|
|