Open Access Publication & ACM
ACM exists to support the needs of the computing community. For over sixty years ACM has developed publications and publication policies to maximize the visibility, access, impact, trusted-source, and reach of the research it publishes for a global community of researchers, educators, students, and practitioners.
In practice, this has meant the following:
- Affordably priced publications
- Liberal self-archiving rights policies for authors
- Liberal reuse rights for the scientific community
- A cutting-edge Digital Library to distribute publications
- A commitment to experiment with and implement new and sustainable business models for open access publication
- Taking a leadership role with respect to the dissemination and utilization of open data and software to increase the reproducibility of scientific research and experimentation
While ACM has always been committed to the ideal of rapid and widespread accessibility of scholarly publications for the computing community via the ACM Digital Library, in recent years ACM has embarked on an aggressive program to experiment with new business models for Open Access Publication. The following is a list of current experiments and initiatives relating to Open Access Publication at ACM.
- Green Open Access
- CHORUS Open Access Initiative
- ACM Authorizer "Open Access" Service
- ACM OpenTOC Service
- ACM OpenSurround Service
- ACM OPEN: ACM’s Transformative Model for Sustainable Open Access Publication
- Hybrid Open Access Publication
- "Anti Double-Dipping" of Article Processing Charges
- Gold Open Access Publication
- Open Access Pricing
- Open Access APC Waivers and Discounts
- Author Rights Management for Open Access Publications
Green Open Access
Otherwise known as "Self-Archiving" or "Posting Rights", all ACM published authors retain the right to post the pre-submitted (also known as "pre-prints"), submitted, accepted, and peer-reviewed versions of their work in any and all of the following sites:
- Author's Homepage
- Author's Institutional Repository
- Any Repository legally mandated by the agency or funder funding the research on which the work is based
- Any Non-Commercial Repository or Aggregation that does not duplicate ACM tables of contents. Non-Commercial Repositories are defined as Repositories owned by non-profit organizations that do not charge a fee to access deposited articles and that do not sell advertising or otherwise profit from serving scholarly articles
For the avoidance of doubt, an example of a site ACM authors may post all versions of their work to, with the exception of the final published "Version of Record", is ArXiv. ACM does request authors, who post to ArXiv or other permitted sites, to also post the published version's Digital Object Identifier (DOI) alongside the pre-published version on these sites, so that easy access may be facilitated to the published "Version of Record" upon publication in the ACM Digital Library.
Examples of sites ACM authors may not post their work to are ResearchGate, Academia.edu, Mendeley, or Sci-Hub, as these sites are all either commercial or in some instances utilize predatory practices that violate copyright, which negatively impacts both ACM and ACM authors.
CHORUS Open Access Initiative
In October 2013, a group of leading commercial and non-profit society publishers, including ACM, joined together to establish a 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation named CHOR Inc. with a mission to support and promote public access to and the continued availability of scholarly publications reporting on US federally funded research by leveraging new and existing digital technologies that are used by the publishing and scholarly communications community.
In late 2013 CHOR Inc. launched its first service called CHORUS, which stands for Clearinghouse for the Open Research of the United States, which serves as an information bridge, supporting "initially" US funding agency search portals and leveraging publishers' existing infrastructure to facilitate a simple compliance process for US federally funded research projects, optimized search and dashboard services, and multi-party archiving and preservation capabilities by leveraging and integrating various technology solutions provided by Crossref, Portico, CLOCKSS, ORCiD, and a growing list of international publishing technology service providers, including Atypon, Clarivate, Aries, Highwire, SilverChair, eJournal Press, Cenveo, and others.
Expansion Beyond United States Federal Funding Agencies
Over the past year, CHORUS has started to expand its services beyond the United States and US Federal Funders, and is currently working with several international funders of computing research, including the Japan Science and Technology Agency and the Australian Research Council, as well as a growing list of US and international academic institutions.
The longterm vision of the organization is to serve as a bridge between funders, researchers, research institutions, and publishers to ensure the public accessibility of scholarly research publications after an initial embargo period and to provide a range of services to these stakeholders.
CHORUS is currently monitoring over 400,000 articles from its approximately 50 member publishers with over 100,000 articles committed by Publishers be being made publicly accessible on the publishers' websites.
How the Service Works
To initiate CHORUS' services, authors simply have to identify their funding sources when submitting a paper for publication with a participating publisher. That action tags the article with the Crossref OpenFunder Registry service, triggering free public access of the best available version (either the final, published version or the author's accepted manuscript), either immediately on publication or after a designated embargo period.
The data that results from the tagging and subsequent public access is collected by Crossref and provided by CHORUS to all at no cost through an open Application Programming Interface (API); this can be used by anyone to create new and customize available search and analytic tools. Applications to optimize search and enable funders to track and ensure compliance and analyze funding impact have already been developed by CHORUS and are available to participating agencies. CHORUS also partners with CLOCKSS and Portico to ensure the archiving and preservation of research papers.
CHORUS' streamlined and cost-effective approach delivers value to funders, publishers, researchers, institutions, and the public at each point in the process of enabling public access:
- IDENTIFICATION: Simply naming the funding source during the article submission process adds metadata from the Crossref Open Funder Registry, which triggers public access to the article and minimizes the time researchers have to spend on administrative tasks.
- DISCOVERY: Users can quickly find the latest research articles via agency portals and common search engines, as well as through CHORUS' optimized search application. CHORUS' open programming and interface invites innovators to develop new tools and functionality that further support public access and facilitates text and data mining on articles reporting on funded research.
- ACCESS: CHORUS points users to the best available version of articles - either immediately on publication or after an embargo period - on the publication sites, where they can find essential context, tools, and information.
- COMPLIANCE: Compliance is easy using simple tagging built into the article submission process, while a CHORUS Dashboard application facilitates monitoring and reporting by funders and publishers without adding unnecessary costs and administrative overhead.
- PRESERVATION: CHORUS ensures the integrity and sustainability of the scholarly record through partnerships with CLOCKSS, Portico, and other services that archive and preserve research articles in perpetuity.
CHORUS currently offers two basic services for authors, funders, institutions, and publishers as follows:
The search service enables users to discover articles reporting on funded research from our publisher members. Learn more about our Search Service. The following link provides information about ACM published articles that are monitored by CHORUS and reported to the large xxxx. To use the search service, please click here.
The dashboard service enables funders, institutions, researchers, publishers, and the public to keep track of public-access compliance by our publisher members. Learn more about our Dashboard Service. For more information about how Institutions can take advantage of the CHORUS Service, please see here. To use the dashboard service, please click here.
CHORUS Participating Funding Agencies
The following is a list of funders currently working with CHORUS:
- National Science Foundation (NSF)
- Department of Defense (DOD)
- Department of Energy (DOE)
- Department of the Interior (DOI) - USGS
- Japan Science & Technology Agency (JST)
- Office of the Department of National Intelligence (ODNI) - IARPA
- Smithsonian Institution (SI)
- US Department of Agriculture (USDA)
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
- Australian Research Council (ARC)
For more information about CHORUS and ACM's role with CHORUS, please contact ACM.
ACM Authorizer "Open Access" Service
ACM Author-Izer is a unique service that enables ACM authors to generate and post links on their homepage and in their employer's Institutional Repository for visitors of those sites to download the definitive "Version of Record" of their articles from the ACM Digital Library at no charge to the author and without any pay-wall constraints for the reader.
Downloads from these sites are captured in official ACM statistics, improving the accuracy of usage and impact measurements. In addition to providing an unrestricted path to Open Access versions of an author's work, the ACM Author-Izer Service's goal is to address the very real problem of "article versioning", which causes significant confusion to the reader, by minimizing the number of "versions" of a work that are accessible from both the ACM Digital Library and third party sites, such as the author's Homepage or Institutional Repository.
ACM Author-Izer also extends ACM's reputation as an innovative "Green Open Access" Publisher, making ACM one of the first publishers of scholarly works to offer this model to its authors.
More information about the ACM Author-Izer Service can be found at: https://www.acm.org/publications/authors/acm-author-izer-service
ACM OpenTOC Service
By leveraging the ACM Author-Izer technology previously developed by ACM, in 2014 ACM developed a new full-text Open Access linking service for use by ACM's Special Interest Group (SIG) communities called the OpenTOC service.
This service enables SIGs to create ACM Author-Ized versions of Tables of Contents for upcoming ACM SIG sponsored conference proceedings and ACM Newsletters. Once activated, these OpenTOCs enable free full-text downloads from the ACM Digital Library, when links are clicked on directly from the ACM SIG or Conference websites.
Effective July 2019, the ACM Publications Board approved a pilot that enables OpenTOCs to be created for ACM SIG Newsletters and made available via ACM SIG Sites. As a pilot there is no guarantee that such OpenTOCs for ACM SIG Newsletters will be persistent over the long term. Based on a variety of factors, at the discretion of the ACM SIG or ACM Publications Board, this pilot could ultimately be discontinued.
The sponsoring SIGs may choose to activate an OpenTOC for the upcoming volume year (with the OpenTOC remaining active for 12 months) or a permanent OpenTOC that remains permanently active on the chosen site(s) to build up a local series archive for either an ACM Conference or related ACM SIG Newsletter. For co-sponsored conferences, all co-sponsors must agree to the posting and each co-sponsor may choose its site(s).
For more information about how the OpenTOC Service works or to learn more about utilizing the service, please go to: https://www.acm.org/publications/policies/permanent-access. If you are an authorized representative of an ACM SIG and would like to participate in this pilot, please contact our Publications Director.
ACM OpenSurround Service
In an effort to provide increased access to ACM Conference Proceedings publications for participants of ACM conferences and the broader computing community at a time when a conference's articles are most in demand, in 2014 ACM launched the ACM OpenSurround Service. This service enables any and all ACM Special Interest Groups (SIGs) to make the entire full-text contents of their SIG-sponsored conference proceedings openly accessible in the ACM Digital Library for up to two weeks prior to and/or subsequent to the event, provided that:
- All sponsoring entities approve, and
- Notice of the intended publication date is given in the Call for Papers
The official publication date will be the date the proceedings are made publicly accessible. For more information about the ACM OpenSurround Service, please go to: https://www.acm.org/publications/policies/free-access
ACM OPEN (ACM’s Transformative Model for Open Access Publication)
ACM is committed to a sustainable future where all peer reviewed scholarly articles will be published in the ACM Digital Library on an Open Access (OA) basis. The transition to this model will take time and needs to be done in a way that ensures the long-term viability of ACM’s Publications program and all of the Good Works that ACM supports through its various educational, diversity and inclusion, public policy, and computing community recognition initiatives. Provided it is achieved in a sustainable manner, the transition to OA should be greatly beneficial to the advancement of computer science in the form of increased usage and citation of research.
Since 2013, ACM has been experimenting with a variety of so called Green & Gold Open Access models for OA publication, including a Hybrid Open Access model, which gives ACM authors the ability to make their individual published Works Open Access immediately upon publication in the ACM Digital Library. While the number of ACM authors opting in for Hybrid OA continues to grow each year and our other OA experiments continue to show real promise, it is becoming clear that none of these models are being adopted at a rate that is likely to result in a complete flip from the current institutional subscription-based licensing model to a wholly Open Access publication model now or in the foreseeable future, so we have continued to explore models that have the potential for greater impact.
At the same time, learned societies and for-profit commercial publishers, including ACM, continue to launch new Gold Open Access publications and are engaging with public and private research funders and governments to experiment with new institutional models for Open Access publication. One such model that appears to show a great deal of promise is the "Read + Publish" model, also called "transformative agreements" for Open Access publication. Many of the large commercial publishers have already executed large-scale "Read + Publish" Agreements with a growing number of European and US-based academic library and government funded consortia, and there is a general sense of optimism that this model can accelerate the growth of Gold Open Access publication and potentially provide a stable and sustainable future for Open Access publication of the scholarly research literature.
The ACM OPEN Model
Over the past year, ACM has been working closely with a group of top-tier research institutions and university library consortia to develop a unique and innovative variation on the typical types of “Read + Publish” models that the large commercial publishers and university presses are piloting, and we are optimistic that the new model we’ve come up with through this collaborative process has the potential to transition ACM to a fully sustainable and Plan S compliant (https://www.coalition-s.org/) OA scholarly publisher within approximately seven to ten years (2027-2029).
A bit of data first to put the model in context. Today, ACM Publications and the ACM Digital Library platform are funded by selling "read" or "access" licenses to approximately 2,700 universities, government research labs, and corporations from around the world. The income generated from the sale of these licenses, which is approximately $20M+ annually, supports the entire ACM organization, including many of the Good Works and Services provided to the global computing community and ACM’s membership of over 100,000 students, researchers, educators, and practitioners from over 150 countries worldwide, as well as the continued improvement and maintenance of the ACM Digital Library itself.
ACM publishes approximately 25,000 articles per year in the ACM Digital Library, ~20,000 of which are full-length peer reviewed research articles published in ACM’s various journals, conference proceedings, and technical magazines. The vast majority of these articles are authored by individuals affiliated with ~1,000 institutions, which is roughly 1/3 of the institutions that license “access” to the ACM Digital Library. So, the main challenge for ACM is how to generate roughly the same income from 1/3 the number of institutions over the long term, as ACM transitions from selling institutional "access" to an institutional "OA publication" model and more and more of the articles published in the ACM DL are published in front of the subscription paywall.
For ACM to thrive in this future, it will be necessary for ACM’s top publishing institutions to commit to a fundamentally new type of model, a model that is likely to cost many of these institutions significantly more money on an annual basis than they are used to paying ACM for just "access" to the ACM DL. This transition may be difficult for some of the largest research institutions that have been enjoying relatively inexpensive "access" to the ACM Digital Library for many years, however, when moving to a model where the cost of publishing an article Open Access is paid upfront by the affiliated institutions, the amount of articles published by that institution is what determines the overall cost for that institution. In the typical "Read + Publish" model, an institution agrees to pay an Article Processing Charge (APC) each time one of their affiliated authors serves as the corresponding author for a published work. These costs will go up and down each year based on publication output and it will be relatively difficult for institutions to budget for these costs.
The ACM OPEN model was developed with this challenge in mind. Rather than basing cost on the exact number of articles published each year, which is typically multiplied by an agreed APC price (~$2,500 - $3,000 per article for many of the large for-profit commercial publishers) to arrive at the total annual deal value to be paid to the Publisher, ACM and the group of institutions mentioned above developed a tier-based system that uses average article publication ranges to determine which tier an institution is placed in, and once placed into that tier the institution will pay a set tier price that does not change during the term of the Agreement. This makes pricing far more predictable than other models being experimented with in the market, and predictability is one of the most important things for both institutions and societies like ACM.
All institutions are placed in the appropriate tier, based on the average annual number of research articles published with ACM over the most recent three-year period. The tier bands and pricing are as follows:
|Tiers Level||Article Output Range||Tier Pricing ($)|
* Tier 10 pricing decreases as the portion of content published OA increases; see the Transition to OA section below
As indicated above, for the largest research institutions publishing the most articles with ACM, overall cost will increase significantly. This is a direct result of ACM’s need to generate more income from the most active publishing institutions, because over the long term the long tail and the income generated by that long tail will shrink dramatically as more and more ACM published articles are published in front of the paywall. With that said, the overall cost of this new model will still be significantly less expensive for nearly all institutions (big and small) than in other Transformative OA deals with other publishers. The tier pricing above is designed to generate roughly the same amount of revenue that is currently being generated by ACM’s publications program, thus ACM views this model as essentially "revenue neutral" once fully adopted by all publishing institutions. It is also important to note that the pricing built in to the price model here is based on ACM’s APC pricing that ranges from $700 to $1,700 US; however, while the model pricing is based on this relatively low APC pricing, the model itself provides for unlimited OA publishing and DL reading for the institution and moves away from a "per article" APC transaction model, thus saving both ACM and participating institutions time and administrative cost.
Initially, the model will be optional for institutions affiliated with ACM authors. This will enable each institution to transition to this new model at their own pace, depending upon their own short-term budgetary constraints and perceived value of migrating to an Open Access future. During the formative years of this transformative plan, institutions publishing with ACM will continue to have the traditional "read only" subscription access as a licensing option while their authors may continue to have their articles opened via payment of Article Processing Charges (APCs).
The institutions participating in ACM OPEN would be welcome to stipulate their authors' licensing terms according to ACM’s author rights options (see https://authors.acm.org/main.html), however the final choice to make the article open would rest with the author. To prove the sustainability of this transformative model, a multi-year commitment of at least three years is required.
As the transformative model progresses and costs shift to the most research intensive, higher-publishing institutions, the institutions publishing very little or no articles with ACM (Tier 10) will see a reduction in their fees. The reduction in Tier 10 institutional fees will progress according to the following chart as more of the annual research contents of the DL are made open once ACM has reached the threshold of 80% of its current year's research articles being published OA, the transformative model will have proved its sustainability and the "full flip" to OA publishing will be achieved. At this stage, all future peer-reviewed research content in the DL will be made OA, and a "read only" subscription option will no longer be available to institutions that have published at least one article with ACM over the previous three calendar years. These low publishing institutions will have the option to participate in the OA tier model, or their authors may choose to pay APCs to make their articles open. Also at this "full flip" stage, institutions that do not publish with ACM at all may still choose to pay the $2,500 fee for access to non-peer reviewed material, the DL archive of more than 500,000 full-text articles, and for platform maintenance. ACM will track the progression of its annual contents' shift to OA and will inform the public once these OA thresholds are reached:
|% of Peer Reviewed Articles Open in DL (Annually)||Tier 10 Pricing ($)|
In the early years of this transition, it is likely that ACM will experience a surplus in revenues as high-publishing institutions commit to this transformative model. ACM is committed to transparency as to how this surplus will be used in support of its various mission-based activities, including diversity and inclusion programs, education programs, needs-based economic waivers for developing nations, and more.
ACM looks forward to working with the scholarly community on this transformative path. We invite any questions and comments. Please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org for more information about this new model.
Hybrid Open Access Publication
Since April 2013, ACM has offered authors of accepted full-length peer reviewed articles in all ACM Publications the option to make their articles Gold Open Access as from the initial date of publication in the ACM Digital Library by agreeing to pay ACM's Open Access Article Processing Charge (APC).
Since that time, thousands of ACM authors have selected this option and made their articles openly accessible to the world via the ACM Digital Library, and the number of authors selecting this option each year since the program's inception has continued to grow.
With that said, the cornerstone of the Hybrid Open Access option for ACM authors is the right to choose whether to make one's work Open Access in the ACM Digital Library in a particular ACM Publication. This choice is made by the author(s) alone, is made on an "article by article" basis, and may be based on a variety of factors, including Funder Open Access Mandates, personal views on the need to support the Open Access Movement, or any number of other reasons.
For authors not subject to a Funder Mandate to publish their work Open Access, unable to procure the funds to make their work Open Access in the ACM Digital Library, or for those authors satisfied with the subscription-based model of scholarly publication, there is no requirement to select this option. For all ACM Hybrid Open Access titles, there continues to be a mix of OA published articles and subscription-based published articles.
"Anti Double-Dipping" of Article Processing Charges
One of the major criticisms of the Hybrid Open Access model by the scientific and library communities is the potential for Publishers and Societies to collect Article Processing Charges from authors without reducing subscription fees to institutional customers (libraries) to access Hybrid journals in an effort to increase revenues and profitability, a practice most commonly referred to as Double Dipping.
When ACM's Publications Board took the decision to launch its Hybrid Open Access model in 2013, it did so with a commitment to the scientific and library communities to eliminate the possibility of double dipping with respect to ACM's Hybrid Open Access program.
Since 2013, ACM has been collecting all APC-related income from authors selecting the Hybrid Open Access option in ACM Publications and maintaining this income in what it has been calling a Hybrid Open Access Fund, with the long-term commitment that these fees will be used in one or more of the following ways:
- Returned to academic ACM Digital Library subscribers as credits against their next year's ACM DL access license fees.
- Used to underwrite the cost of APC embargo periods for newly launched Gold Open Access journals or ACM journals migrating from subscription-based to a Gold Open Access model.
- Used to underwrite Financial Waivers for ACM authors financially unable to pay Article Processing Charges (APCs) for ACM Gold Open Access journals.
Since launching this program, ACM has returned over $1.0M in APC income to the global academic library community from over 100 countries around the world and is starting to utilize part of this Fund to underwrite the launching of new Gold Open Access journals and existing ACM journals that are transitioning to a pure Gold OA model.
Gold Open Access Publication
Unlike Hybrid Open Access journals, Gold Open Access journals are completely open via the ACM Digital Library with all articles requiring either a paid Article Processing Charge or a Financial Waiver, issued by ACM and based on certain criteria defined by ACM.
While ACM's Hybrid Open Access program was an important first step to providing a large-scale option for all ACM authors to make their ACM published works available on a Gold Open Access basis, for many in the scholarly community Hybrid Open Access is viewed as a partial solution, since it still involves the maintenance and perpetuation of the longstanding subscription model and the well publicized Library Serials Crisis, originally perpetuated by rising journal prices and static or declining Library Serials Budgets in the 1980s and 1990s, but still existing today. Others believe the subscription model is not inherently problematic, even though some of the largest and most profitable commercial publishers have taken advantage of their strong market positions by maintaining large portfolios of "Must Have" titles for the scientific community.
But whatever one believes is the right approach for the future, over the last decade or more there has been an enormous change in the scholarly publishing landscape with new publishers entering the market at a rapid pace with new Gold Open Access business models, large commercial publishers, particularly those in Europe, have embraced the Gold OA model by launching literally hundreds of new titles and acquiring existing pure Gold Open Access publishers and publications, and most of the world's leading non-profit publishers and societies have launched their own pure Gold Open Access journals into the marketplace in nearly every area of research and scholarly publication that exists.
In the early years, this "land grab" was dominated by many so called "predatory" publishers, characterized by relatively low quality publications and unethical business practices, but as time has gone by and many of the established and reputable journals publishers have entered the market and invested heavily in building Gold Open Access publication programs, the landscape of Gold Open Access has essentially evened out with a mixture of high quality, mediocre quality, and low quality publications, similar to what has long existed in the subscription-based journals market.
At the same time, Funders of research, including many of the largest governments around the world, including the US, UK, Germany, France, Netherlands, Japan, and other national governments around the world have become more active in terms of issuing government mandates for publishing funded research results in Openly Accessing publications and repositories.
Indeed, a number of the largest funders of scientific research around the world express a preference for publishing in Gold Open Access over Hybrid Open Access venues. Still other agencies and funders express no preference, but allow for grant recipients to utilize research funding to underwrite the cost of "reasonable" Open Access Article Processing Charges (APCs) to ensure that their funded works are made Openly Accessible to the world.
In addition to governments, many of the largest and most influential research institutions and universities around the world have announced similar "mandates" for the open access publication of research outputs, including peer reviewed articles and the underlying research artifacts, such as the software, data, and code relating to those published works.
As a result of the above mentioned changes and other changes ACM has seen occurring in the scholarly publishing landscape, and as the result of feedback ACM regularly receives from the scientific community via its thousands of authors, editorial board members, editors-in-chief, and volunteers around the world, in 2017 ACM launched the first of a number of new pure Gold Open Access journals, as well as laid the groundwork for transitioning a small number of existing ACM journals over to a pure Gold Open Access publication model as an initial experiment to gauge interest from the scientific community.
ACM will continue to experiment with APC-based Gold Open Access and explore other sustainable funding models for scholarly publication. Above all else, ACM's focus will remain on high quality publication and sustainability of its publication program and the historical record of its publications via the ACM Digital Library.
The following is a current list of ACM's pure Gold Open Access Journals:
- ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI)
- Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages (PACM PL)
- ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization (TACO)
Open Access Pricing
The pricing below is valid for all hybrid and gold open access publications:
|Authors||No ACM or SIG members||At least 1 ACM or SIG member|
|Proceedings of the ACM Article||$900||$700|
Open Access APC Waivers and Discounts
ACM offers Article Processing Charge (APC) waivers for ACM Authors based in low income and lower middle income countries, as identified by the World Bank List of Economies:
Full waivers are available to ACM Authors based in low income countries. ACM Authors from lower middle income countries are eligible for a 50% discount off applicable ACM Open Access APCs.
Authors based outside of low income or lower middle income countries may apply for a discretionary waiver from ACM, based on financial need. The criteria used to evaluate such applications includes:
- The name of the author's affiliated institution or organization
- The research funding source and size
- The funder's OA publication policies
- Other financial considerations
To request a discretionary Open Access APC waiver, please write to email@example.com.
APC waivers are offered for ACM Gold OA journals only. Waivers are not available for ACM's Hybrid Open Access publications. All articles published in ACM's Hybrid Open Access publications for which an Open Access APC has not been paid shall default to the traditional institutional licensing model and be immediately accessible to authorized users only at ACM's approximately 2,800 academic, government, and industry institutional subscribers and ACM's more than 20,000 individual member subscribers to the ACM Digital Library.
Author Rights Management for Open Access Publications
Authors of peer reviewed and accepted articles who select to publish their work utilizing the Hybrid Open Access option for all ACM Hybrid Open Access titles or authors publishing in any of ACM's new pure Gold Open Access titles are able to choose any "level" of rights ownership and management they prefer, including the following:
- Granting a non-exclusive license for ACM to publish their work in the ACM Digital Library, while retaining all rights to their work, including copyright, and which allows for perpetual open access and the option to have their published work governed by a Creative Commons License upon publication.
- Retaining copyright and granting an exclusive license for ACM to publish their work in the ACM Digital Library
- Granting all publication rights, including copyright, to ACM to manage the work on their behalf. This option enables ACM to protect and defend against improper use of the author's work by third parties, including ethical and legal violations of their works, such as plagiarism or copyright violations.
Regardless of which option authors publishing their work on an Open Access basis with ACM select, all ACM authors retain all other proprietary rights not granted to ACM, including patent, trademark, or moral rights, major revision rights, self-archiving or posting rights, auxiliary material usage rights, and ownership rights and control of third-party permissions of artistic images and the use of software published by ACM in connection with the author's published work.
For more information about Author Rights, please see ACM's official Copyright Policy at: https://www.acm.org/publications/policies/copyright-policy
Updated October 2019
Written by leading domain experts for software engineers, ACM Case Studies provide an in-depth look at how software teams overcome specific challenges by implementing new technologies, adopting new practices, or a combination of both. Often through first-hand accounts, these pieces explore what the challenges were, the tools and techniques that were used to combat them, and the solution that was achieved.
Why I Belong to ACM
Hear from Bryan Cantrill, vice president of engineering at Joyent, Ben Fried chief information officer at Google, and Theo Schlossnagle, OmniTI founder on why they are members of ACM.
ACM Queue’s “Research for Practice” consistently serves up expert-curated guides to the best of computing research, and relates these breakthroughs to the challenges that software engineers face every day. This installment of RfP is by Anna Wiedemann, Nicole Forsgren, Manuel Wiesche, Heiko Gewald, and Helmut Krcmar. Titled “The DevOps Phenomenon,” this RfP gives an overview of stories from across the industry about software organizations overcoming the early hurdles of adopting DevOps practices, and coming out on the other side with tighter integration between their software and operations teams, faster delivery times for new software features, and achieving a higher level of stability.