The influence of video in desktop computer interactions

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

The influence of video in desktop computer interactions

Full text

Pdf (797 KB)

Source

Conference on Supporting Group Work archive
Proceedings of the conference on Organizational computing systems table of contents

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Pages: 106 - 116

Year of Publication: 1991

ISBN:0-89791-456-2

Also published in ...

Authors

Ronald H. Nowaczyk	Clemson University
Terri L. Thomas	Clemson University
Darryall O. White	Clemson University

Sponsor

SIGGROUP: ACM Special Interest Group on Supporting Group Work

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 0, Downloads (12 Months): 15, Citation Count: 0

Additional Information:

references index terms collaborative colleagues peer to peer

Tools and Actions:	Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTex EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/122831.122840 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Brown, E. F., Geller, V. J., Goodnow, J. E., Hoecker, D. G., & Wish, M. (1980). Some objective and subjective differences between communication over two videoconferencing systems. IEEE Transactions on Communications, COM-28, 759-764.
	2	Chapanis, A. (1975) . Interactive human communication. Scientific American, 232 (3), 36-42.
	3	Carmen Egido, Teleconferencing as a technology to support cooperative work: its possibilities and limitations, Intellectual teamwork: social and technological foundations of cooperative work, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, 1990
	4	Gale, S. (1989) . Adding audio and video to an office environment. Proceedings of the First European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (London, Sept. 13-15), 121-133.
	5	Hall, J. A. (1987). On explaining gender differences' The case of nonverbal communication. In P. Shaver & C. Hendrick (Eds.) Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 177 -200.
	6	Christian Heath , Paul Luff, Disembodied conduct: communication through video in a multi-media office environment, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Reaching through technology, p.99-103, April 27-May 02, 1991, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States [doi>10.1145/108844.108859]
	7	LaPlante, D. (1971). Communication, friendliness, trust and the prisoner's dilemma. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Windsor, Windsor, Canada.
	8	Brenda Laurel , Tim Oren , Abbe Don, Issues in multimedia interface design: media integration and interface agents, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Empowering people, p.133-139, April 01-05, 1990, Seattle, Washington, United States [doi>10.1145/97243.97265]
	9	Miller, D. P. and Stone, A. C. (19 89) . PzotoTymez ~ Human performance instrumentation for Hypercard prototyping. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 33rd Annual Meeting, 249-253 .
	10	Payne, J. W. (1976). Task complexity and con~ingen~ processing in decision making- An information search and protocol analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 366-387 .
	11	Williams, E. (1977) . Experimental comparisons of face- to- face and mediated communication' A review. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 963-976.