ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Cost-driven design for archival repositories
Full text PdfPdf (180 KB)
Source International Conference on Digital Libraries archive
Proceedings of the 1st ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries table of contents
Roanoke, Virginia, United States
Pages: 363 - 372  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-345-6
Authors
Arturo Crespo  Computer Science Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Hector Garcia-Molina  Computer Science Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 31,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/379437.379729
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Designing an archival repository is a complex task because there are many alternative configurations, each with different reliability levels and costs. In this paper we study the costs involved in an Archival Repository and we introduce a design framework for evaluating alternatives and choosing the best configuration in terms of reliability and cost. We also present a new version of our simulation tool, ArchSim/C that aids in the decision process. The design framework and the usage of ArchSim/C are illustrated with a case study of a hypothetical (yet realistic) archival repository shared between two universities.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
C. Borgman, S. Chen, H. Garcia-Monlina, K. Thibodeau, , and G. Wiederhold. NSF Workshop on Data Archival and Information Preservation. National Science Foundation, March 1999.At http://cecssrv1.cecs.missouri.edu/NSFWorkshop/.
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
A. Crespo and H. Garcia-Molina. Taking cost-driven decisions about archival repositories. Technical report, Stanford University. At http://www-db.stanford.edu/ crespo/papers, 2001.
 
6
Gartner Consulting. TCO Analyst. A White Paperon GartnerGroup's Next Generation Total Cost of Ownership Methodology, 1997.
 
7
8
 
9
R. Howard. The science of decision-making. In Readings on the Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis, volume 1, 1964.
 
10
 
11
H. Levy. Stochastic Dominance: Investment Decision Making under Uncertainty. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.
 
12
C. S. von Holstein. Assessment and evaluation of subjective probability distributions. Technical report, Economic Research Institute, Stockholm School of Economics, 1970.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Arturo Crespo: colleagues
Hector Garcia-Molina: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: