ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Computing and accountability
Full text pdf formatPdf (5.91 MB)
Source Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 37 ,  Issue 1  (January 1994) table of contents
Pages: 72 - 80  
Year of Publication: 1994
ISSN:0001-0782
Author
Helen Nissenbaum  Princeton Univ., Princeton, NJ
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 13,   Downloads (12 Months): 155,   Citation Count: 11
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/175222.175228
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
3
 
4
De George, R. Ethical responsibilities of engineers in large organizations. The Pinto case. In Collective Responsibility, L., may and S. Hoffman, Eds., 1991, Rowman land Little field, pp. 151-166.
 
5
Feinberg, ,J. Collective responsibility. om Doing and Deserving. J. Feinberg. Ed., 1970. Princeton University Press, Princeton N.J.
 
6
Fitzgerald, S. Hospital Computer Predicts Patients' Chances of survival. The miami Herald, 1992, Miami, p.,6}
 
7
Hart, H.L.A. Punishment and Responsi bility. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1968.
 
8
Hart, H.L.A and Ahonore, T.Causation and the Law. Second ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1985.
 
9
Jacky, J. Safety-crotoca; cp,{itomg. Hazards, practice, standards and regulations. Unpublished manuscript. Universityu of Washington. 1989.
 
10
Johnson, D.G. and Mulvey, J.M. Com puter Decisions: Ethical Issujes of Respon sibility and Bias. Statistics and Operations Research Series, Princeton University, 1993.
 
11
Ladd., J. Computers and moral responsibility: A framework for an ethical; ama;usos. In the Inforamtion Web: Ethical and social Imnplications of Computer Networking, C.C. Gould, Ed. Westview Press, Boulder Colo. 1989.
12
 
13
 
14
Littlewood, B. and Strigum, L. The risks of software, Sci Am. (1992), 62- 75.
 
15
Mor, J. What is computer ethics? Metaphilosophy 16, 4 (1986), 266-275.
 
16
Neuman.P.G. Inside RISKS. Commun.ACM.
 
17
Nissenbaum, H. Should I copy my neighbor's software? Comput. Philos. To be published.
18
 
19
Samuelson, P. Adapting Intellectual Preopery Law to New Technologies: A Case Study on Computer Programs. National Research Council, 1992.
20
21
 
22
Smith, B. The limits of correctness. center for the study of languate and information, Rep. CSLI-85-35, Stanford, 1985.
 
23
Snapper, j.W. Responsinility for computer-based errors. Metaphilosophy 16 (1985), 289-295.
 
24
 
25
Thompson, S.mThe moral responsino;otu opf m,au hands. In Polotical Ethics and public office. Harvard University Press, Cambrige, Mas. 1987. pp.40-65.
 
26
Turkle, S. The second self. simon & Schster, Inc., New york, 1984.
 
27
Velasquez, m/ Why corporations are nbot norally responsible for anything thy do . In Collective Responibility, I., May and S. Hoffman, Eds. Rowman and Little field, 1991, pp. 111 131.
 
28
Weizenbaum, J. on the inpact of the computer on sociey, Science 176. 12 (1972), 609-614.

CITED BY  11
 
 


REVIEW

"Andrew Robert Huber : Reviewer"

Nissenbaum's thesis is that computerization is undermining accountability. Accountability provides value to society by motivating those most likely and able to prevent risk and harm to society to do so. Accountability, of course, implies poten  more...


Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: