ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A performance analysis of alternative multi-attribute declustering strategies
Full text PdfPdf (1.07 MB)
Source International Conference on Management of Data archive
Proceedings of the 1992 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data table of contents
San Diego, California, United States
Pages: 29 - 38  
Year of Publication: 1992
ISBN:0-89791-521-6
Also published in ...
Authors
Shahram Ghandeharizadeh  Department of Computer Science, University of Southern California
David J. DeWitt  Computer Sciences Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Waheed Qureshi  Department of Computer Science, University of Southern California
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
SIGMOD: ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 26,   Citation Count: 27
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/130283.130293
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

During the past decade, parallel database systems have gained increased popularity due to their high performance, scalability and availability characteristics. With the predicted future database sizes and the complexity of queries, the scalability of these systems to hundreds and thousands of processors is essential for satisfying the projected demand. Several studies have repeatedly demonstrated that both the performance and scalability of a paralel database system is contingent on the physical layout of data across the processors of the system. If the data is not declustered properly, the execution of an operator might waste resources, reducing the overall processing capability of the system. With earlier, single attribute declustering strategies, such as those found in Tandem, Teradata, Gamma, and Bubba parallel database systems, a selection query including a range predicate on any attribute other than the partitioning attribute must be sent to all processors containing tuples of the relation. By directing a query with minimal resource requirements to processors that contain no relevant tuples, the system wastes CPU cycles, communication bandwidth, and I/O bandwidth, reducing its overall processing capability. As a solution, several multi-attribute declustering strategies have been proposed. However, the performance of these declustering techniques have not previously been compared to one another nor with a single attribute partitioning strategy. This paper, compares the performance of Multi-Attribute GrId deClustering (MAGIC) strategy and Bubba's Extended Range Declustering (BERD) strategy with one another and with the range partitioning strategy. Our results indicate that MAGIC outperforms both range and BERD in all experiments conducted in this study.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
BAC+90
 
BDC83
CABK88
 
DGS+90
 
GD90
 
Gha90
 
GMSY90
S. Ghandeharizadeh, 1~. 1~ Meyer, G. L. Schultz, and J. Yackel. Optimal balance partitions and a parallel database application. Computer sciences technical report, UW-Madison, December 1990. To appear in Operation Research Society of America (ORSA) Journal of Computing.
 
Gra89
G. Graefe. Volcano: An extensible and parallel dataflow query processing system. Computer science technical report, Oregon Graduate Center, Beaverton, OR, june 1989.
 
Hsi90
Hui Hsiao. A vailibility in Multiprocessor Database machines. PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin- Madison, 1990.
 
Liv88
M. Livny. DeNet User's Guide. Computer Sciences Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1988.
LKB87
NHS84
 
RE78
D. Ries and R. Epstein. Evaluation of distribution criteria for distributed database systems. UCB/ERL Technical Report M78/22, UC Berkeley, May 1978.
 
Sch90
 
SPO88
Tan88
 
Ter85
Teradata Corp. DBC/IOI2 Data Base Computer System Manual, November 1985. Teredata Corp. Document No. C10-0001- 02, Release 2.0.
TP72

CITED BY  27
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Shahram Ghandeharizadeh: colleagues
David J. DeWitt: colleagues
Waheed Qureshi: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: