ACM Annual Reports Archive 2006-2018
by Year
Fiscal Year 2018 Reports
- USACM FY 2018
- ACM-W Women's Council FY 2018
- ACM Distinguished Speakers Program (DSP) FY 2018
- ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy (CCPP) FY 2018
- ACM Committee on Professional Ethics (COPE) FY 2018
- Special Interest Group Governing Board FY 2018
- ACM Europe Council FY 2018
- ACM India Council FY 2018
- History Committee 2018
- Practitioners Board FY 2018
- Publications Board FY 2018
- Education Board FY 2018
Fiscal Year 2017 Reports
- ACM Annual Report FY 2017
- ACM-W Women's Council FY 2017
- USACM FY 2017
- ACM Committee on Professional Ethics (COPE) FY 2017
- History Committee FY 2017
- Practitioners Board FY 2017
- Special Interest Group Governing Board FY 2017
- Publications Board FY 2017
- Education Board FY 2017
- India Council FY 2017
Fiscal Year 2016 Reports
- ACM Annual Report FY 2016
- USACM FY 2016
- Education Policy Committee FY 2016
- Committee on Professional Ethics FY 2016
- ACM-W Women's Council FY 2016
- History Committee FY 2016
- Coalition to Diversify Computing FY 2016
- Europe Council FY 2016
- Publications Board FY 2016
- Practitioners Board FY 2016
- Special Interest Group Governing Board FY 2016
- Education Board FY 2016
Fiscal Year 2015 Reports
- ACM Annual Report FY 2015
- USACM FY 2015
- Education Policy Committee FY 2015
- Committee on Professional Ethics FY 2015
- ACM-W Women's Council FY 2015
- History Committee FY 2015
- Coalition to Diversify Computing FY 2015
- Europe Council FY 2015
- India Council FY 2015
- China Council FY 2015
- Special Interest Group Governing Board FY 2015
- Education Board FY 2015
Fiscal Year 2014 Reports
- ACM Annual Report FY 2014
- USACM FY 2014
- Committee on Computers and Public Policy FY 2014
- ACM-W Women's Council FY 2014
- History Committee FY 2014
- Coalition to Diversify Computing FY 2014
- Computer Science Teachers Association FY 2014
- Practitioners Board FY 2014
- Europe Council FY 2014
- Publications Board FY 2014
- Special Interest Group Governing Board FY 2014
- Education Board FY 2014
Fiscal Year 2013 Reports
- ACM Annual Report FY 2013
- USACM FY 2013
- Committee on Professional Ethics FY 2013
- Committee on Computers and Public Policy FY 2013
- ACM-W Women's Council FY 2013
- Coalition to Diversify Computing FY 2013
- Computer Science Teachers Association FY 2013
- Practitioners Board FY 2013
- Europe Council FY 2013
- India Council FY 2013
- Publications Board FY 2013
- Special Interest Group Governing Board FY 2013
- Education Board FY 2013
Fiscal Year 2012 Reports
- ACM Annual Report FY 2012
- USACM FY 2012
- Committee on Computers and Public Policy FY 2012
- ACM-W Women's Council FY 2012
- History Committee FY 2012
- Professional Development Committee FY 2012
- Distinguished Speaker Program Committee FY 2012
- Awards Committee FY 2012
- Practitioners Board FY 2012
- Publications Board FY 2012
- Special Interest Group Governing Board FY 2012
- Education Board FY 2012
Fiscal Year 2011 Reports
- ACM Annual Report FY 2011
- USACM FY 2011
- Committee on Professional Ethics FY 2011
- Committee on Computers and Public Policy FY 2011
- Computer Science Teachers Association FY 2011
- History Committee FY 2011
- Professions Board FY 2011
- Distinguished Speaker Program Committee FY 2011
- Awards Committee FY 2011
- Publications Board FY 2011
- Special Interest Group Governing Board FY 2011
- Education Board FY 2011
Fiscal Year 2010 Reports
- ACM Annual Report FY 2010
- USACM FY 2010
- Committee on Computers and Public Policy FY 2010
- ACM-W Women's Council FY 2010
- History Committee FY 2010
- Professions Board FY 2010
- Awards Committee FY 2010
- Special Interest Group Governing Board FY 2010
- Publications Board FY 2010
- Education Board FY 2010
- Europe Council FY 2010
Fiscal Year 2009 Reports
- ACM Annual Report FY 2009
- USACM FY 2009
- Professions Board FY 2009
- Awards Committee FY 2009
- Special Interest Group Governing Board FY 2009
- Publications Board FY 2009
- Education Board FY 2009
Fiscal Year 2008 Reports
- ACM Annual Report FY 2008
- USACM FY 2008
- Professions Board FY 2008
- Committee on Computers and Public Policy FY 2008
- History Committee FY 2008
- Awards Committee FY 2008
- Special Interest Group Governing Board FY 2008
- Publications Board FY 2008
- Distinguished Speakers Program FY 2008
- Computer Science Teachers Association FY 2008
- Education Board FY 2008
Fiscal Year 2007 Reports
- ACM Annual Report FY 2007
- USACM FY 2007
- Awards Committee FY 2007
- Special Interest Group Governing Board FY 2007
- Individual SIG Annual Reports [Appendix D] FY 2007
- Membership Services Board FY 2007
- Education Board FY 2007
- Publications Board FY 2007
Fiscal Year 2006 Reports
- ACM Annual Report FY 2006
- ACM-W Women's Committee FY 2006
- Computer Science Teachers Association (CSTA) FY 2006
- Publications Board FY 2006
- Special Interest Group Governing Board FY 2006
- Awards Committee FY 2006
- Education Board FY 2006
- Membership Services Board FY 2006
- Distinguished Lecturship (DLP) FY 2006
- Professions Board FY 2006
ACM Case Studies
Written by leading domain experts for software engineers, ACM Case Studies provide an in-depth look at how software teams overcome specific challenges by implementing new technologies, adopting new practices, or a combination of both. Often through first-hand accounts, these pieces explore what the challenges were, the tools and techniques that were used to combat them, and the solution that was achieved.
Why I Belong to ACM
Hear from Bryan Cantrill, vice president of engineering at Joyent, Ben Fried chief information officer at Google, and Theo Schlossnagle, OmniTI founder on why they are members of ACM.
The DevOps Phenomenon
ACM Queue’s “Research for Practice” serves up expert-curated guides to the best of computing research, and relates these breakthroughs to the challenges that software engineers face every day. This installment, “The DevOps Phenomenon” by Anna Wiedemann, Nicole Forsgren, Manuel Wiesche, Heiko Gewald, and Helmut Krcmar, gives an overview of stories from across the industry about software organizations overcoming the early hurdles of adopting DevOps practices, and coming out on the other side with tighter integration between their software and operations teams, faster delivery times for new software features, and achieving a higher level of stability.
