SGB/SGB-EC Action Items
Action: Baglio will have ACM HQ staff put together a summary of exposure for each of the SIGs. This information will be forwarded to the SGB EC for review and will be included in future viability reports.(5/5/03)
Action: Frawley to work with SIGecom leadership to provide an update to the SGB EC at the Sept'05 meeting following the Ecom'05 conference.
Action: R. Walker to appoint SGB representative to PD Committee to oversee the pilot test and fully develop the operations and budget models for the PDC program.
Action: Ramdin to modify the DL revenue distribution mechanism so that no SIG will receive less than $10,000.
Action: Baglio to inform appropriate staff that SIGACCESS has been taken out of transition and placed in permanent status for a 2 year period.
Action: Frawley to modify viability schedule and schedule SIGACCESS for March'07 review.
Action: Frawley to modify viability schedule and schedule SIGMICRO for March'09 review.
Action: Frawley to modify viability schedule and schedule SIGMM for March'09 review.
Action: Frawley to modify viability schedule and schedule SIGSAC for March'09 review.
Action: Frawley to modify viability schedule and schedule SIGSAM for March'07 review.
Action: Volcheck to provide SGB EC with written update on SIGSAM activities and finances in March'06.
Action: Frawley to modify viability schedule and schedule SIGSIM for March'09 review.
Action: Ignatoff to modify viability schedule and schedule SIGSOFT for March'09 review.
Action: R. Walker to send note to Chris Stevenson informing her that the SGB allocated $100K per year for CSTA funding. Note should indicate that the funding is renewable for 3 years with the endorsement of the SGB, the concerns of the SGB and the reporting requirements of CSTA.
Why I Belong to ACM
Hear from Bryan Cantrill, vice president of engineering at Joyent, Ben Fried chief information officer at Google, and Theo Schlossnagle, OmniTI founder on why they are members of ACM.
Written by leading domain experts for software engineers, ACM Case Studies provide an in-depth look at how software teams overcome specific challenges by implementing new technologies, adopting new practices, or a combination of both. Often through first-hand accounts, these pieces explore what the challenges were, the tools and techniques that were used to combat them, and the solution that was achieved.
ACM Queue’s “Research for Practice” serves up expert-curated guides to the best of computing research, and relates these breakthroughs to the challenges that software engineers face every day. This installment, “The DevOps Phenomenon” by Anna Wiedemann, Nicole Forsgren, Manuel Wiesche, Heiko Gewald and Helmut Krcmar, gives an overview of stories from across the industry about software organizations overcoming early hurdles of adopting DevOps practices, and coming out on the other side with tighter integration between software and operations teams, faster delivery times for new software features, and achieving higher levels of stability.